Ok guys you're making alot of sense. Im not trying to turn a sow's ear into a silk purse. The snob in me always walked past the "Handies", thinking they cant be as good as a Ruger #1. That's a matter for another discussion; BUT they're not $1000.oo either. The same thought comes to mind about the Sharps, Rolling Blocks and various Hi/Low Walls. I love them all and there's "lust in my heart" for a Quigly; but dust in my wallet.
Soooo, here's my thinking, I can get a BC for around $300.oo and a 32 inch brass scope for about the same. I need a gunsmith to fit the scope because it has a flat bottom mount (for octagonal barrels). Hopefully that wont cost as much as a house payment.
I'll leave it in 45-70 for now. If its a good shooter like you guys say, then I'll add an extra barrel with a folding Buckhorn sight and maybe send the scoped barrel for rechambering to 45-120. If I do eventually go for the 45-120, Im guessing some lead might find its way into the butt and handguard.
What you all said about the adding weight to the hammer makes so much sense that Im embarrassed that I missed it. I havent given up on it or the sidelever; but Im willing to set it aside until I can work out the other issues.
For those who wondered, one grandfather was a from the Austrian Alps and the other was Dutch / Bore