Author Topic: comparing  (Read 302 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline gdolby

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 212
  • Gender: Male
comparing
« on: February 10, 2007, 05:52:23 PM »
anybody compared the interbond to the accubond? how do they stack up against the partition? I have real good luck with the partition and just wander if it is worth trying to beat with the 2 bullets mentioned above. You all have a good day and good shooting.....Bill

Offline hunter5325

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 52
Re: comparing
« Reply #1 on: February 11, 2007, 11:57:51 AM »
The Accubond and the Interbond both have a much higher B.C.  They carry more velocity down range and therefore hit a bit harder.  In my guns(30-06, 7mm, 300winmag) they have both been more accurate than the Part.  The Accubond is a little more like the Partition in that it sheds a bit more weight in the frontal area on impact.  The Interbond holds together better and retains a little more weight.  In my opinion they are both better then the Partition.  My personal favorite is the Interbond.  I've had passthrough-bang flops on all the mulies I've shot with the 150gr 30cals out of the 06 and the 300mag.  They work great for elk too!  Brett
100% Public land DIY

Offline gdolby

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 212
  • Gender: Male
Re: comparing
« Reply #2 on: February 18, 2007, 06:16:59 AM »
ty for your reply. have a good day...bill