Fred,
To get these measurements I used both LBT push through slugs and egg shaped lead sinkers.
First, after cleaning the barrel I pushed an LBT slug through, chamber to muzzel. I didn't like how it felt; tight at first then sloppy loose the rest of the way out. I posted about it here a few weeks ago. On Quick's suggestion I slugged both ends. At the muzzel I pushed in anoter LBT slug just far enough to get a good engraving of the lands then scratched an index mark on the slug before pulling it back out. I did the same with a sinker, pushing it back out with a rod from the chamber. At the chamber I did essentially the same thing, but I couldn't make the index marks.
My mesuremens were done with a dial caliper. I really do need to get a micrometer. At any rate, the diameter difference across the grooves is readily discernable on the caliper.
After taking the measurements of the LBT muzzel slug I reindexed it in the muzzel and gently pushed it all the way through. After pushing it through the tight spot just ahead of the throat it came out with the smaller ~.286 groove diameter rather than the ~.287 it started with at the muzzel. I wish I knew someone with a bore scope.
I too have wondered about what kind of pressure curve this would produce and whether bullets would have a rattle fit the rest of the way down the barrel. I hadn't considered blow by. I'll bet you're right on that one too.
I don't know if I can, and haven't tried to get a measurement across the lands. I would expect that to be .284 or less. The wife's out of the house for another hour. I'll see what I can come up with. I should repeat the muzzel to chamber process again too.
I dread having to send this rifle back to the factory and have been dragging my feet on making the call.