Author Topic: Tough week for Rosie.. (Read 1537 times)

ironglow · « **on:** April 30, 2007, 03:46:33 PM »

Yup ! A pretty tough week for Rosie..

1) she gets her "walking papers" from that imbecilic TV show.

2) Then some thoughtless truck driver bothered to turn over his fuel truck and the heat from the resulting fire so weakened the structure, that one steel framed bridge collapsed upon another..and that collapse did not need a couple 747s crashing into it at 300-500 mph !

..Come to think of it..the collapse of that bridge may have collapsed some balloons of a few "conspiracy theories" also..LOL

powderman · « **Reply #1 on:** April 30, 2007, 04:08:54 PM »

YEP. And it was all BUSHS fault, just ask tm7. POWDERMAN.

Hooker · « **Reply #2 on:** April 30, 2007, 04:29:00 PM »

I had the same thoughts

Let's hope poor Rosie has many more weeks like this one LOL

Pat

ironglow · « **Reply #3 on:** May 01, 2007, 04:45:37 AM »

Nope..A contained fuel fire gets even hotter than an open one..just check any blacksmith's forge and compare the surface or outer periphery of the fire to the center of the fire..can easily be 1500-2000 degrees hotter in the center.

Remember; I said that the steel doesn't have to be melted to collapse a bridge or a building..when steel is heated to about 800 degrees, it has already compromised about half or better of it's strength.

After the bridge collapse, I was In a discussion with a building engineer just yesterday. He told me that in cities with many high rise buildings..the buildings are DESIGNED in such a way that in any such catastrophy, they will collapse in upon themselves rather than to take several other structures with them..

He said that zoning laws demand such..also the insurance underwriters would insist that such designs be utilized..

Sounds logical to me !

C'mon TM..you don't really want to be considered a mouthpiece for Rosie do you ?

Almtnman · « **Reply #4 on:** May 01, 2007, 07:01:24 AM »

We had an Interstate bridge collapse the same way here in AL a couple of years back. The steel beams sagged down to within a few feet of the Interstate below from the heat after a gasoline tanker wrecked underneath and caught on fire.

rockbilly · « **Reply #5 on:** May 01, 2007, 08:25:19 AM »

Isn't it amazing how a member of such a few has so much clout? It seems to me that the media is so tolerant of gays, allow them to openly show their lifestyle on TV. As the majority, we need an aggressive display of support to tell those who advertise on the gay/lesbian programs that we will not buy their products if they continue to support gay programing, or those who are openly gay. There is strength in numbers.

Almtnman · « **Reply #6 on:** May 01, 2007, 08:28:13 AM »

I totally agree with that. If the media wants to throw that stuff on us, we all need to get the word out that we're not ready to buy into that.

beemanbeme · « **Reply #7 on:** May 01, 2007, 08:31:15 AM »

If Thunder Butt was as straight as a string, she would still be an obnoxious, rude, ill-informed, ill mannered, skank.

jhm · « **Reply #8 on:** May 01, 2007, 12:34:39 PM »

Rockabilly: The only thing with responding to her and her ILK is it means they are being listened to and thats their agenda, remember they believe that any type of publicity good or bad is publicity and thats what they want, its kinda like the agenda some have here reguarding our president, he wants to get his agenda agenda across and likes to push the envelope, I wont mention any names as to give him any portion of publicity but you would know the 7. JIM

powderman · « **Reply #9 on:** May 01, 2007, 03:40:16 PM »

TM7. Do you have a favorite brand of foil??? I'd like to invest in that company. Can't you imagine the tremendous amount of pressure that the upper floors had on those weakened beams??? POWDERMAN.

billy_56081 · « **Reply #10 on:** May 01, 2007, 03:51:36 PM »

Glad to see Rosie O go! I'm thinking it's a good thing that she is gay. Could you imagine having her as a mother. And even worse as a wife! Kinda gives ya the chills don't it.

I hope her rude, arrogant fat rear end don't get another show.

powderman · « **Reply #11 on:** May 02, 2007, 03:30:47 AM »

TM7. We all watched it live and in numerous replays. We all saw the 2nd plane hit. A friend of mine was there and saw it firsthand. Imagine the carnage if the Godless ones had aimed much lower. Nobody in the upper floors lived.
ROCKBILLY. Only one good thing about rosie o, her gene pool stops with her, thankfully, she will never reproduce. POWDERMAN.

nomosendero · « **Reply #12 on:** May 02, 2007, 04:31:12 AM »

Quote from: rockbilly on May 01, 2007, 08:25:19 AM

Isn't it amazing how a member of such a few has so much clout? It seems to me that the media is so tolerant of gays, allow them to openly show their lifestyle on TV. As the majority, we need an aggressive display of support to tell those who advertise on the gay/lesbian programs that we will not buy their products if they continue to support gay programing, or those who are openly gay. There is strength in numbers.

Yes indeed!!!! That's the same reason I will not buy a Ford.

nomosendero · « **Reply #13 on:** May 02, 2007, 04:36:37 AM »

Yes Mr. TM7, maybe we could have a REAL investigation of 911.

We could form a commission with Rosie, Mr. Tenet, the 911 commission (again), John Kerry, Shawn Penn & Michael Jackson. Then we could get to the real truth!!

magooch · « **Reply #14 on:** May 02, 2007, 04:49:10 AM »

TM7, it's fine to be a skeptic, but there's a big difference between scratching your butt and tearing a hole in it.

wncchester · « **Reply #15 on:** May 02, 2007, 12:39:57 PM »

[powderman = Only one good thing about rosie o, her gene pool stops with her, thankfully, she will never reproduce. POWDERMAN.

]

As a side note, your proper observation on diminishing reproductive impact for homo/les people is why I can't believe it's a genetic trait.

Even if it might have been a DNA reality a few thousand years ago, by now their much lower rate of reproduction would have thinned them completely outta the gene pools deep end! It has to be a personal choice for most if not all of them.

billy_56081 · « **Reply #16 on:** May 02, 2007, 04:20:48 PM »

Well I think Rosie and Other Bull type lesbians sexuality is genetic. Can you imagine a someone liker her being able to attract a mate? EWWWW!

nomosendero · « **Reply #17 on:** May 02, 2007, 04:41:36 PM »

Quote from: billy_56081 on May 02, 2007, 04:20:48 PM

Well I think Rosie and Other Bull type lesbians sexuality is genetic. Can you imagine a someone liker her being able to attract a mate? EWWWW!

You may be more accurate than you thought!

powderman · « **Reply #18 on:** May 02, 2007, 04:47:22 PM »

BILLY. I can easily see bigbutt with a non male, notice I didn't say woman. I cannot envision her with a man, unless he was deaf, dumb, and blind. YEEEEEEEECCCCCHHHHHH. POWDERMAN.

SHOOTALL · « **Reply #19 on:** May 03, 2007, 02:46:51 AM »

In no particular order - Rosie and a mate , watch oh ---- tv on cable , there is someone that stupid !
Steel and heat , been a pipe fitter most of my life , steel pipe or any pipe for that matter is rated at how many pound per sq. inch of pressure it can withstand ! and that spec. is always followed by a temp. max. on some pipe it has multp. ratings and all have temp. max. with them . if that dosen't clear up the ( hot metal bends /breaks ) deal we will have to realize some people are void of logic ! and go on !
As good folks we should realize its not Rosie's fault some event has made her this aggressive out of control loud mouth , much like a child who is not a pretty child or a smart child or a good at sports , who has to misbehave to get attention !
This is just an opinion not based in fact but then again when has fact made a difference when Rosie was concerned ?
We as a group should take up a collection and see if the dog whisper guy could correct her poor behavior ! I have watched a few of his shows and he has worked with meaner dogs before ! imho !

powderman · « **Reply #20 on:** May 03, 2007, 03:24:21 AM »

TM7. Your order is on the way, I doubled it. I do like orange but prefer iced tea. POWDERMAN.

magooch · « **Reply #21 on:** May 03, 2007, 04:42:10 AM »

.
Magooch wrote:

Quote

TM7, it's fine to be a skeptic, but there's a big difference between scratching your butt and tearing a hole in it.

.
No doubt about that. But for alot of people it is easier to belief a simple lie than a complex truth.

....TM7
[/quote]

Apparently for some, it's easier to believe a complex lie than the simple truth.

SHOOTALL · « **Reply #22 on:** May 03, 2007, 05:39:30 AM »

Only in America can the destruction of two of the largest buildings in the world in front of 5 or 6 million people be a plot with no leaks and the rough treatment of a few prisoners of war can't be covered up in a war zone or the extra activity of an aide to the president can't be private ! We are lied to no doubt , but someone always spills the beans ! If they didn't we would never know !
The building falling into itself , on a perfect day in a perfect world i wouldn't bet even money on that one ! Where was the test building for the data to come up with that design , if it exist did it include a building getting hit with who knows how much force ? an oil fire (JET fuel is closer to kerosene ) maybe off center of the structure maybe causing the collapse to hinge to one side rather than funnel to the middle with a more centered fire and collapse ! How high would the debris pile be ? how tall vs. foot print ? Look at what can be seen

nomosendero · « **Reply #23 on:** May 03, 2007, 08:49:57 AM »

No test either way, now what?

ironglow · « **Reply #24 on:** May 03, 2007, 05:57:35 PM »

it is surely a woman's right and privilege to be ugly...but Rosie ABUSES that privilige !

Kinda wonder if I were right with that "woman" part...

SHOOTALL · « **Reply #25 on:** May 04, 2007, 01:13:59 AM »

No test , no way to know what a building will do , no conclusive way to design ! Rosie dosen't abuse ugly , she takes it to the limit , new heights if you will ! And will someone explain about collision insurance for buildings ? Most insurance is not enforceable during an act of war ?
It is a shame !