Author Topic: Broadhead failure  (Read 1573 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Fixit

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 65
Broadhead failure
« on: October 09, 2021, 01:47:18 PM »
Has anyone ever had a mechanical broadhead come apart and result in loosing a deer? I believe this happened to me yesterday, with a rage that had almost no blood trail, with one unbloodied blade laying on the ground where the deer was standing. I saw the fur disturbance,and the shot was good.
chicken little has finally found an audience

Offline billy_56081

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (5)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8575
  • Gender: Male
Re: Broadhead failure
« Reply #1 on: October 09, 2021, 02:01:08 PM »
I had a rocky mountain grim reaper fail on me but in found the deer. The expandable blades sheard off the set screw, luckily it had about a half in wide fixed blade in the tip that passed through.  I found the expandable blades about an inch or two in the entrance
99% of all Lawyers give the other 1% a bad name. What I find hilarious about this is they are such an arrogant bunch, that they all think they are in the 1%.

Offline Fixit

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 65
Re: Broadhead failure
« Reply #2 on: October 09, 2021, 02:20:36 PM »
Judging by the blood trail, or lack thereof, I suspect the other blade may have been flung away at entry, and the wound was little worse than would be done by a field point. Upsetting none the less. Not recovering an animal bugs me, badly, as it should.
chicken little has finally found an audience

Offline billy_56081

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (5)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8575
  • Gender: Male
Re: Broadhead failure
« Reply #3 on: October 09, 2021, 04:46:33 PM »
I believe the broadhead I was using was the 2 bladed version of the rage. Barrie archery 🏹 I believe sold the patent. I think I posted about it many many years ago on the original gbo site.
99% of all Lawyers give the other 1% a bad name. What I find hilarious about this is they are such an arrogant bunch, that they all think they are in the 1%.

Offline Ranger99

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9581
Re: Broadhead failure
« Reply #4 on: October 09, 2021, 05:56:56 PM »
Sorry to hear of that
I've already had my go round with
mechanical /expanding heads.
No more for me
18 MINUTES.  . . . . . .

Offline Lloyd Smale

  • Moderators
  • Trade Count: (32)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18267
Re: Broadhead failure
« Reply #5 on: October 09, 2021, 11:38:57 PM »
ive shot a number of deer with the 125 1.5 rage out my Raven R20 and never had a single issue. one thing i found with them though is you should change out those rubber o rings every year. They do get brittle and break and it allows the broadhead to open in flight. Never shot a deer like that because i was told by another rage user and actually kept some for 2 years and tried them and about half opened in flight.
blue lives matter

Offline teamnelson

  • Trade Count: (30)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4487
  • Gender: Male
Re: Broadhead failure
« Reply #6 on: October 10, 2021, 02:13:49 AM »
Sorry to hear that my friend - I can imagine how frustrating that must be. The consensus in some of the crossbow forums is that dental bands are better than the factory o-rings, and it seems the thing to do is to swap them out even on a new package as you don't know how old the o-rings are. The higher speed/energy crossbows produce can test the elasticity on those things.
held fast