Author Topic: Why the 38-40?  (Read 821 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline gazz

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 54
Why the 38-40?
« on: July 12, 2007, 06:19:52 PM »
Hi,
Is anyone shooting a 38-40? Do they have any advantages over the 44-40?
I have got a problem with my back and the recoil of a 44-40 (light as it is),is about all I need.
So, how do the 38s compare with regard to recoil and accuracy?
I am strictly into paper punching.
Thanks,
gazz.

Offline Sir Charles deMoutonBlack

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 323
Re: Why the 38-40?
« Reply #1 on: July 13, 2007, 05:32:25 AM »
As far as recoil?   About the same bullet weight, and powder charge; - very little difference, IMHO.

Greater cost for new dies & bullets or moulds.  You CAN use .40 S&W bullets @ 170 gr. but still not enough difference.

Other than that, I love my first generation Colt SAA in .38-40

Offline longcaribiner

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 376
Re: Why the 38-40?
« Reply #2 on: July 17, 2007, 04:18:16 AM »
The 38-40 is  a misnomer because it is actually a 40 caliber, the bullets being only .025 less in diameter than the 44-40.
Now, 44-40's can be loaded down to some extremely mild recoil.   I loaded a bunch of 44-40 cartridges with mild charges of very slowly burning rifle powder.  The result was a recoil just above a 22 RF and less than a 38 S&W.  I don't recall where I found the load published, but it worked very well to teach my daughter to reload and shoot a center fire.  (Sometimes I thought I could just get a glimpse/see the bullet travel down range.)   If shooting black powder, there is always cream of wheat and other fillers to "down" the charge.  Even a wad and grease cookie will help fill the case and work to lessen the charge of black powder