Author Topic: Savage 93  (Read 1029 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline jwinva

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 42
  • Gender: Male
Savage 93
« on: July 04, 2007, 10:59:45 AM »
I'm thinking about a Savage model 93.For those of you who have them, which did you get and why? 93F,93FV,or93G? I like the idea of a little heavier rifle but I don't know about the 93FV.Is it too heavy forward to shoot offhand?

Offline .450Marlin

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 42
Re: Savage 93
« Reply #1 on: July 04, 2007, 12:57:30 PM »
I had a 93F for a while and liked it well enough. Savage builds a handy, accurate rifle and doesn't charge much for them; I honestly think they are a better buy than the Marlins, especially the newest ones with the Accutrigger ;) Mine was a pre-Accutrigger model and I got it for a very good price (around $140 IIRC). The trigger was good enough for my purposes and the rifle was more accurate than I could ever be, even with just the factory sights. I ended up selling mine to help finance a Henry because A. .22WMR is getting too expensive for me and B. the magazines that it uses are very poor in my opinion. I doubt the Marlin ones are much better, but the stamped steel clips Savage is selling are not good designs; both of mine had feeding problems and misshaped feed lips--better quality control or a tubular magazine would solve this issue. I can easily recommend the rifle, but just watch out for the clips. If they work right, you'll have a damn fine rifle for the money in my book ;D Hopefully, Savage/Lakefield Arms will come out with a better clip design or better yet a tube-fed version of this series at some point in the future. I hope this helps some & best of luck with your decision...if you get good mags, I think you'll be quite happy with a Savage 93.

Kind Regards,

.450Marlin

Offline whiskey101

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 152
  • Gender: Male
Re: Savage 93
« Reply #2 on: July 22, 2007, 12:14:26 PM »
I have a 93GL in .22mag and it is my favorite bolt action rimfire. It is a tack driver and the accutrigger is great, beats the heck out of all the other factory options out there. I don't really see the need for the heavy barrel, but I don't shoot p-dogs. I mostly use mine for squirrels and any other unlucky small game that comes within the 100 yard range.
"So he cocked both his pistols, spit in the dirt, and walked out into the street."

Offline ice

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 78
Re: Savage 93
« Reply #3 on: August 23, 2007, 07:51:17 AM »
A suggestion if I may.
Go with a wood stock and Accutrigger.

Offline Birddog1

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 38
Re: Savage 93
« Reply #4 on: August 23, 2007, 09:15:59 AM »
A suggestion if I may.
Go with a wood stock and Accutrigger.

That's what I did.  I just bought a 93FV, 17hmr.  Wood stock, heavy barrel and accutrigger.  Man is it a sweet shooting gun.  A couple of years ago I had the Ruger 77/17 and it shot OK.  The Savage is much better, the accutrigger is really nice.  It comes preset from the factory at the lowest poundage, I think it's about 2.5 lbs.  It's not too heavy to hold offhand.  In fact, I think the extra weight works well to add some stability. 

Offline GregP42

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (6)
  • A Real Regular
  • *****
  • Posts: 752
  • Gender: Male
Re: Savage 93
« Reply #5 on: August 23, 2007, 09:47:42 AM »
I have a 93v17 BVSS, mine is an older one before the accutrigger, the trigger is the only thing I would change out if it does not have the new one on it. But mine has a laminated stock on it so I haven't thought about replacing it.

Greg
NRA Life Member
"Those who sacrifice essential liberty for temporary safety are not deserving of either liberty or safety."  - Ben Franklin, 1776
Vis Sis Mis!