« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Bushnell 3200 vs. Nikon Buckmaster 3x9 40  (Read 780 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline czs4me

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Posts: 3
Bushnell 3200 vs. Nikon Buckmaster 3x9 40
« on: August 21, 2007, 05:42:41 PM »
I'm looking at nearly equal price for either and need for help in deciding.  Many thanks.
Logged

Offline dougk

  • Moderators
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1937
  • Driftwood TEXAS
Re: Bushnell 3200 vs. Nikon Buckmaster 3x9 40
« Reply #1 on: August 22, 2007, 04:42:13 AM »
I have seen refurbished Nikons for sale.  I dont remember seeing refurbished Bushnell 3200s. 
Logged

Offline eye shot

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 665
    • Mike's Obituary
Re: Bushnell 3200 vs. Nikon Buckmaster 3x9 40
« Reply #2 on: August 22, 2007, 06:52:55 AM »
The Nikon has a little more eye relief.
Logged
RIP Mike. Died on July 14th, around 2am, with his family at his side, he went peacefully to be with god.

http://www.sent-trib.com/obituaries/michael-l-schulte

Offline Luckyducker

  • Trade Count: (5)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 645
Re: Bushnell 3200 vs. Nikon Buckmaster 3x9 40
« Reply #3 on: August 22, 2007, 03:13:18 PM »
I have several Buckmaster scopes and really think they are a great value, but have only looked through one 3200 and wasn't impressed.  If I were to buy another rifle scope I would probably spend the extra bucks and get the Nikon Monarch.  BTW, I have a 3-9X40 Buckmaster on my 338RUM and it has never been knocked off zero by recoil or by me bumping it around.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »