Author Topic: .45 Colt for Elk?  (Read 959 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Randy M

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 55
.45 Colt for Elk?
« on: November 14, 2007, 03:43:14 PM »
Assuming shot selection is good, what is your opinion of the following set-up for Elk?

250 grain Hornady XTP - 1200 fps - 50 yard shot

thanks,
Randy

Offline MS Hitman

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 561
Re: .45 Colt for Elk?
« Reply #1 on: November 14, 2007, 04:54:22 PM »
First off, get rid of the XTP and go with a 300 grain hard cast bullet in either LBT or Keith form.

 Load this bullet to between 1,000 to 1,200 fps and you should have no problem taking an elk if you do your part.

Offline Graybeard

  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (69)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27008
  • Gender: Male
Re: .45 Colt for Elk?
« Reply #2 on: November 14, 2007, 05:19:22 PM »
Yeah I'd have to agree with Hitman I'd loose that 250 XTP for elk. Would do fine on deer but on elk I'd go with a hard cast for sure and not less than 270-300 grains.


Bill aka the Graybeard
President, Graybeard Outdoor Enterprises
256-435-1125

I am not a lawyer and do not give legal advice.

Jesus is the way, the truth, and the life anyone who believes in Him will have everlasting life!

Offline Redhawk1

  • Life time NRA Supporter.
  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (78)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10748
  • Gender: Male
Re: .45 Colt for Elk?
« Reply #3 on: November 15, 2007, 01:02:16 AM »
I agree 100% with MS Hitman and Graybeard. I would never consider a XTP for anything other than a deer bullet.
If  you're going to make a hole, make it a big one.
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
Only two defining forces have ever offered to die for you,
Jesus Christ and the American G. I.
One died for your soul, the other for your freedom

Endowment Life Member of the NRA
Life Member NA

Offline Randy M

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 55
Re: .45 Colt for Elk?
« Reply #4 on: November 17, 2007, 07:02:43 AM »
Thanks guys.

best,
Randy