Author Topic: Parrott question, trunion caps  (Read 691 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Soot

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 391
Parrott question, trunion caps
« on: January 13, 2008, 08:01:38 AM »
Hi, I've been searching for info on this for quite some time but I've never seen it addressed anywhere. It looks to me like larger Parrott rifles and some others don't have any type of trunnion caps. The smaller field models like the 10pdr do. Is it just gravity and the angle of the carriage that keeps the barrel in place or am I missing something? Thanks.

Offline Double D

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12608
  • SAMCC cannon by Brooks-USA
    • South African Miniature Cannon Club
Re: Parrott question, trunion caps
« Reply #1 on: January 13, 2008, 09:13:12 AM »
This 15 inch Rodman doesn't appear to have caps



This 8 inch Rodman has a spacer to make the trunnion fit, but no caps.



This 8  inch siege Mortar has caps



So does this 13 inch.



 


Offline Soot

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 391
Re: Parrott question, trunion caps
« Reply #2 on: January 13, 2008, 09:44:29 AM »
Exactly, even big mortars have caps, why not these guns? I could see 10,000+ pounds of barrel holding it self down, I guess. But what about the quite small in comparison, SeaCoast Artillery replica? It looks to me like the angle of the carriage and gravity hold it all together, weird.

Offline Cat Whisperer

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7493
  • Gender: Male
  • Pulaski Coehorn Works
Re: Parrott question, trunion caps
« Reply #3 on: January 13, 2008, 10:26:16 AM »
Soot -

WELCOME to the board!

Good question!  I don't have an answer, but good question!

DD -

That one "spacer" on the Rodman looked like a CAM!

Tim K                 www.GBOCANNONS.COM
Cat Whisperer
Chief of Smoke, Pulaski Coehorn Works & Winery
U.S.Army Retired
N 37.05224  W 80.78133 (front door +/- 15 feet)

Offline Terry C.

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1215
  • Gender: Male
  • I see what you did there...
Re: Parrott question, trunion caps
« Reply #4 on: January 13, 2008, 10:32:28 AM »
It could be due to the recoil-absorbing nature of the barbette mounts of the Rodmans and large Parrotts.

Offline seacoastartillery

  • GBO Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2853
  • Gender: Male
    • seacoastartillery.com
Re: Parrott question, trunion caps
« Reply #5 on: January 13, 2008, 11:06:43 AM »
     You guys are sharp!  Parts of the reason have already been revealed, but in addition to the much increased weight of these tubes and the way they are allowed to move, with their upper carriages to the rear during recoil upon the smooth surfaces of the chassis rails which are inclined from 3 deg to 7 deg., there is also a very subtle engineering design factor at work here.  By design, the rear of the trunnion cradle is just slightly higher that the front which is in the same plane, in which lies the trunnion axis. So movement is stopped by a mechanical feature, not just weight.  Field guns and mortars jump all over and sometimes rebound violently, hence the Capsquares used to retain the trunnions. 
     Naval cannon, even very heavy ones, use Capsquares as well due to the lurching of their carriages upon the deck while underway. 

Regards,

Tracy and Mike
Smokin' my pipe on the mountings, sniffin' the mornin'-cool,
I walks in my old brown gaiters along o' my old brown mule,
With seventy gunners be'ind me, an' never a beggar forgets
It's only the pick of the Army that handles the dear little pets - 'Tss! 'Tss!

From the poem  Screw-Guns  by Rudyard Kipling

Offline Soot

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 391
Re: Parrott question, trunion caps
« Reply #6 on: January 13, 2008, 11:10:25 AM »
Genius Civil War engineering, cool.

Offline GGaskill

  • Moderator
  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5668
  • Gender: Male
Re: Parrott question, trunion caps
« Reply #7 on: January 13, 2008, 11:12:56 AM »
Another thing to consider is that field artillery spends most of its time being transported on rough roads (no interstates in their days) and the tubes needed to be restrained from bouncing out of the carriages.  The seacoast artillery didn't move once emplaced.  Also, the guns are fired with some elevation so the recoil has a downward component that helps hold the trunnions in the carriages.
GG
“If you're not a liberal at 20, you have no heart; if you're not a conservative at 40, you have no brain.”
--Winston Churchill

Offline phalanx

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2880
Re: Parrott question, trunnion caps
« Reply #8 on: January 13, 2008, 11:17:38 AM »
The trunnion cap, and cradles i have ,or the ones i have seen for wooden carriages that people bought separate for a project ,came as a set.
Like buying a bearing ,A perfect match between cap and cradle.
The rear of them is cantered up from the front about 30 degrees ,Allowing the recoil of the Barrel when fired to be pushing back on the bearing surface and not where the two parts join ,or the joining bolt.
I often wondered about this myself ,after seeing photos of guns with no caps.
In that one photo that DD put up the entire cap and cradle are cantered buy the carriage angle.
In this time i Command ,That you take the Secular to Jerusalem .
There you rid the Holy City of the Scourge of Islam , Make the streets run red with the Blood of those who wish to wash Israel and Christianity from the face of the Earth.
Constantine III

Offline Soot

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 391
Re: Parrott question, trunion caps
« Reply #9 on: January 13, 2008, 12:16:02 PM »
Thanks for all the replys, this is all very interesting.
This is also interesting. I didn't see anywhere else to post it so I'll put it here.
This is a link to the 12in seacoast rifled mortars by my house, with lots of good tech data.
http://www.fortdesoto.com/

Offline Terry C.

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1215
  • Gender: Male
  • I see what you did there...
Re: Parrott question, trunion caps
« Reply #10 on: January 13, 2008, 12:44:02 PM »
Those 12" mortars have appeared here before.

I can't remember who posted them, but they deserve a second look.



Offline seacoastartillery

  • GBO Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2853
  • Gender: Male
    • seacoastartillery.com
Re: Parrott question, trunion caps
« Reply #11 on: January 13, 2008, 01:03:51 PM »
     Double D posted a very interesting thread a while back which had some very nice pics of those deck-crushing, 12 ", Model 1890 Mortars.  I hope this link gets you there:

http://www.gboreloaded.com/forums/index.php/topic,126704.0.html


Regards,  Mike and Tracy
Smokin' my pipe on the mountings, sniffin' the mornin'-cool,
I walks in my old brown gaiters along o' my old brown mule,
With seventy gunners be'ind me, an' never a beggar forgets
It's only the pick of the Army that handles the dear little pets - 'Tss! 'Tss!

From the poem  Screw-Guns  by Rudyard Kipling

Offline Terry C.

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1215
  • Gender: Male
  • I see what you did there...
Re: Parrott question, trunion caps
« Reply #12 on: January 14, 2008, 12:31:30 AM »
Okay, I was wrong. The 12" mortars in the photos that I remembered were the ones on Corregidor.

But there was mention of the battery at Ft. DeSoto, so maybe that stuck in my head.