« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: S&W model 25-5?  (Read 1323 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline S.B.

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (6)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3953
  • Gender: Male
S&W model 25-5?
« on: January 11, 2008, 03:32:17 PM »
I just bought one from a dealer on GA. What should the chamber throats average compared to the bore size? I know S&W had some problems with these guns and the chamber dimensions.
I don't have this gun yet, so I can't measure the actual size of the chamber throats, just wondering what ratios would work for this pistol?
Logged
"The Original Point and Click Interface was a Smith & Wesson."
Life member of NRA, USPSA,ISRA
AF&AM #294
LIUNA #996 for the past 34 years/now retired!

Offline MS Hitman

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 561
Re: S&W model 25-5?
« Reply #1 on: January 12, 2008, 12:07:07 AM »
Why don't you just shoot the revolver after you take possession before worrying about the the dimensions?  I have never understood those who buy a firearm and before they shoot it; start wanting to change this or that about it.  The revolver may shoot just fine with the loads you intend to use; if not, then you start trying to solve the "problem".
Logged

Offline Ken ONeill

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1259
  • Gender: Male
Re: S&W model 25-5?
« Reply #2 on: January 12, 2008, 01:18:03 AM »
I LOVE an intelligent answer.
Logged

Offline S.B.

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (6)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3953
  • Gender: Male
Re: S&W model 25-5?
« Reply #3 on: January 12, 2008, 01:26:35 AM »
MS Hitman, probably 1500 miles in between me and the gun? You talk like your not familiar with the problems S&W had with these guns? Having read some of you past posts I know better. Half the fun in handguns is tinkering, to me? Why else would someone reload, if not to improve ammunition? Maybe why at 59 I still ride a Harley?
Logged
"The Original Point and Click Interface was a Smith & Wesson."
Life member of NRA, USPSA,ISRA
AF&AM #294
LIUNA #996 for the past 34 years/now retired!

Offline MS Hitman

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 561
Re: S&W model 25-5?
« Reply #4 on: January 13, 2008, 11:45:46 AM »
I'm very aware that all manufacturers had, at one time or another, a problem with sloppy dimensions in their revolvers chambered in .45 Colt.  My point is why would one want to start correcting a problem unless it is identified as a problem.  Also, not every revolver had problems in the same degree. 

Maybe why at 42 I'm still an engineer.
Logged

Offline Dan Chamberlain

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 406
Re: S&W model 25-5?
« Reply #5 on: January 13, 2008, 02:13:59 PM »
Original post:

"I just bought one from a dealer on GA. What should the chamber throats average compared to the bore size? I know S&W had some problems with these guns and the chamber dimensions.
I don't have this gun yet, so I can't measure the actual size of the chamber throats, just wondering what ratios would work for this pistol?"

I see where someone is asking what chamber throats should be.  I don't see anyone indicating they intend to change anything prior to shooting it.  It just isn't there.  For me, I always wonder about people who assume too much and don't actually answer the question being asked in the thread.  But that's just me.

Dan
Logged

Offline Mikey

  • GBO Supporter
  • Moderator
  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8734
Re: S&W model 25-5?
« Reply #6 on: January 13, 2008, 03:13:58 PM »
S.B.:  I believe the throats on that M25 should run in the .452 - .455" range and so should the bores.   From somewhere I recall reading that some of the newer handguns or handgun models in the 45 Colt caliber are or have been pretty well standardized.  I would think the throats and bores should be pretty close in a S&W, possibly within one or two thousands. 

I'm not aware of any problems with the M25s.  The M25s are quality pieces.  It sounds like a nice piece.  I understand that S&W will stand behind their products.

I've never measured the throats in my revolvers - it just never occurred to me to do as the accuracy I was getting was what I was asking for and I wasn't having any problems with any particular loads.  I prefer cast bullets to run one thousands over bore - those seem to give me the best accuracy.  However, I think you would be unhappy with a .452 throat and a .454 bore but possibly not the other way around.  HTH.  Mikey.
Logged

Offline S.B.

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (6)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3953
  • Gender: Male
Re: S&W model 25-5?
« Reply #7 on: January 13, 2008, 04:55:17 PM »
After I confirmed that I wanted the gun and sent a money order for payment the seller backed out and sold this gun to a different buyer? Guess I'll start all over looking for a 25-5? Awfully sour about this deal.
Logged
"The Original Point and Click Interface was a Smith & Wesson."
Life member of NRA, USPSA,ISRA
AF&AM #294
LIUNA #996 for the past 34 years/now retired!

Offline warrior1

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 618
Re: S&W model 25-5?
« Reply #8 on: January 14, 2008, 02:25:23 AM »
sb, how long a barrel you looking for,i just saw one on gunbroker with an 8" barrel.
Logged
Dan Deluca aka "warrior1" has passed away.  Dan was a frequent poster here and on several other sites.  He passed away on 12/29/08 from a massive heart attack. RIP Dan.

Offline S.B.

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (6)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3953
  • Gender: Male
Re: S&W model 25-5?
« Reply #9 on: January 14, 2008, 02:59:03 AM »
4"
Logged
"The Original Point and Click Interface was a Smith & Wesson."
Life member of NRA, USPSA,ISRA
AF&AM #294
LIUNA #996 for the past 34 years/now retired!

Offline Dr. A

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 72
Re: S&W model 25-5?
« Reply #10 on: January 16, 2008, 04:30:49 AM »
My 25-5 has throats right at .456.  The groove/bore diameter is more in keep with what we expect.  Can't remember it exactly now, though.
Logged

Offline tallpaul

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 122
Re: S&W model 25-5?
« Reply #11 on: January 16, 2008, 09:13:52 AM »
What was the price you won it for? I  have one I acquired in sept an have not shot yet. As I understood the 25-5's without the pinned and recessed are fine and the throats are better...

there was/is a great one on the smith forums in the last day or so...
Logged
Jesus Loves You.... right now just as you are.

Offline tallpaul

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 122
Re: S&W model 25-5?
« Reply #12 on: January 16, 2008, 09:21:17 AM »
Logged
Jesus Loves You.... right now just as you are.

Offline S.B.

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (6)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3953
  • Gender: Male
Re: S&W model 25-5?
« Reply #13 on: January 16, 2008, 10:30:28 AM »
tallpaul, what are you talking about, that's not even the site?
Logged
"The Original Point and Click Interface was a Smith & Wesson."
Life member of NRA, USPSA,ISRA
AF&AM #294
LIUNA #996 for the past 34 years/now retired!

Offline tallpaul

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 122
Re: S&W model 25-5?
« Reply #14 on: January 17, 2008, 07:33:21 AM »
well sb it is the site but I forgot ya have to register to see the classifieds there... it was a LNIB 25-5 but the guy wanted to trade... it did not last long. I only noticed it because I have one and it was really nice! 
Logged
Jesus Loves You.... right now just as you are.

Offline S.B.

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (6)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3953
  • Gender: Male
Re: S&W model 25-5?
« Reply #15 on: January 17, 2008, 11:27:22 AM »
tallpaul, the one I was dealing on was on Guns Amerioca? No S&W cylinders were every recessed except for magnums and rimfires? Yes, the later 25-5s without the pinned barrel, have a better reputation.
Logged
"The Original Point and Click Interface was a Smith & Wesson."
Life member of NRA, USPSA,ISRA
AF&AM #294
LIUNA #996 for the past 34 years/now retired!
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »