Author Topic: New cartridges: progress or planned obsolescence?  (Read 276 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Questor

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7075
New cartridges: progress or planned obsolescence?
« on: January 23, 2008, 04:11:09 AM »
It occurs to me that many redundant cartridge introductions of the past several years may be an attempt to introduce the concept of planned obsolescence into the firearms business. It seems to me that things like the T/C rifle chambered for 30 TC is the perfect candidate to become a safe queen when the ammo supply becomes scarce and another latest-and-greatest 30-06 variant comes on the market.

What do you think?
Safety first

Offline mjbgalt

  • Trade Count: (26)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2367
  • Gender: Male
Re: New cartridges: progress or planned obsolescence?
« Reply #1 on: January 23, 2008, 04:28:20 AM »
dunno...i mean, if it was a sweeper or something you would have to leave it in the closet and buy a new one. but it's a gun and we can reload ammo forever...at the very least it won't be as bad as with other products...even if that type of introduction IS what's happening. but when hornady is in on it...i wouldn't think they would WANT to produce ammo they they can't sell forever and get their R&D money back on...

-Matt
I have it on good authority that the telepromter is writing a stern letter.

Offline coyotejoe

  • Trade Count: (4)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2937
  • Gender: Male
Re: New cartridges: progress or planned obsolescence?
« Reply #2 on: January 23, 2008, 05:22:59 AM »
Well something like that. They introduce new cartridges to sell new rifles. We had all the options anyone could possibly need more than 50 years ago, there just is no real world advantage to the new rounds. The gun rags pay writers to whip up a lot of hype for some new gadget and build up a fad for those who just have to own the newest, fastest, lightest, shiniest, shortest, longest, biggest, whatever. That does sell guns, ammo, reloading equipment, etc. and that keeps the wheels turning.
  The greatest problem for gunmakers is they have to compete in the market with their own products made years ago. Talk about "durable goods", what's more durable than a firearm? There are enough Winchester 94s, Marlin 93s, Mausers, Springfields, even Krags to outfit ever hunter in the U.S. and if they've been at all well cared for they work as well today as anything you can buy brand new. Look at the advances in automobiles, aircraft, and especially electronics compared to firearms. The '98 Mauser came before the model T Ford or the Wright Flyer and there is nothing on the market today that really makes the Mauser obsolete. There have been many improvements and refinements but nothing really earth shaking since smokeless powder and even many of the improvements have been due to improved powders rather than any real innovation in firearms.
The story of David & Goliath only demonstrates the superiority of ballistic projectiles over hand weapons, poor old Goliath never had a chance.

Offline SHOOTALL

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 23836
Re: New cartridges: progress or planned obsolescence?
« Reply #3 on: January 23, 2008, 08:16:37 AM »
some of the guys that made bass lures got jobs with gun co's. so now we get anything they can think up to make us buy !
If ya can see it ya can hit it !