« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: .348 in 1895?  (Read 741 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline scout34

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 253
.348 in 1895?
« on: January 27, 2008, 04:37:31 AM »
I haven't been able to find any information on pressures in a .348 Win.  Is the Marlin 1895 able to handle that cartridge?  I have an idea for a project rattling around in my head and was just wondering.
Logged

Offline jbadams66

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 47
Re: .348 in 1895?
« Reply #1 on: January 27, 2008, 05:22:52 AM »
the 348 Winchester is to long to work in the marlin 1895 action.  I believe dave clements offers the 348 DC that should match the 348 win and is offered in the 1895 action.
Logged
Geologist know what makes the bedrock!

Offline scout34

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 253
Re: .348 in 1895?
« Reply #2 on: January 27, 2008, 07:37:55 AM »
I've been drooling over the Wild West guns co-pilot take down models and it occurred to me that you could set up that take-down with additional barrels as long as the cartridge rim was the same size.  Not too many options in 45-70 though.  Maybe if I got one in .444 I could have another barrel made up in .358 or .309 JDJ.

Anybody have any ideas?
Logged

Offline Dand

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (35)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2974
Re: .348 in 1895?
« Reply #3 on: January 28, 2008, 10:16:44 PM »
I'd call Wild West and ask them.  Or try emailing them but they tend to give short answers if they answer at all.  They can also seem in a rush when you call them but if you get Jim himself he might give you some time and ideas.

Good luck.
Logged
NRA Life

liberal Justice Hugo Black said, and I quote: "There are 'absolutes' in our Bill of Rights, and they were put there on purpose by men who knew what words meant and meant their prohibitions to be 'absolutes.'" End quote. From a recent article by Wayne LaPierre NRA

Offline Swampman

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (44)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16518
  • Gender: Male
Re: .348 in 1895?
« Reply #4 on: January 29, 2008, 12:07:21 AM »
I wish Marlin would make the .375 JDJ a standard offering.  T/C offers loaded ammo. but I'm not sure it would function in the .444 Marlin length action.
Logged
"Brother, you say there is but one way to worship and serve the Great Spirit. If there is but one religion, why do you white people differ so much about it? Why not all agreed, as you can all read the Book?" Sogoyewapha, "Red Jacket" - Senaca

1st Special Operations Wing 1975-1983
919th Special Operations Wing  1983-1985 1993-1994

"Manus haec inimica tyrannis / Ense petit placidam sub libertate quietem" ~Algernon Sidney~

Offline scout34

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 253
Re: .348 in 1895?
« Reply #5 on: February 04, 2008, 12:53:29 PM »
Talked to SSK, and they will not do a rebarrel of a tubular magazine rifle in one of their JDJ cartridges due to the pointed bullets used.   :'( 

Here is another question:  I know that the .444 has a .514 rim and the 30-30 has a .506 rim, is this too much of a difference for a 30-30 to work on a .444 bolt face?  I think a .444/.30-30AI switch barrel would be pretty neat.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »