I have loaded a lot of H4831 into .243 Win., 270 Win., and 7MM Remington Magnum over the years, the only one that I use magnum primers with is the 7MM Remington Mag.
I use Winchester primers when loading ball powders, and again magnum primers for the 7MM Mag. when loading ball powders. My “belief” is that Winchester loads it’s factory rounds with ball powder, and list their standard large rifle primer with most of their published loads, and therefore I match the primer to the powder.
I am happy with the paper accuracy of my loads, which exceed the paper accuracy of most factory ammunition I have purchased. If I were loading for competition I would try the magnum primers and do a side-by-side comparison of the loads over the Chrony and on paper.
My experience when loading H4831 in the .270 Win. using standard primers and firing over the Chrony is that I am obtaining expected velocity. In my pre-Chrony days I did load a couple hundred rounds using magnum primers and did not see any measurable difference on paper.
I have used IMR4350, H414 (ball), WW785 (ball), and H4831 when loading the 243 Winchester. This rife seems to be inherently accurate. I used CCI200 standard large rifle primers with all loads except with H414. I used Winchester Large Rifle primers with the H414. If I was to load the cartridge again using WW785 I would switch to Winchester large rifle.
The question that comes to mind is if a standard primer ignites 60-grains of H4831successfully in a large .270 case, should it not successfully ignite 45-grains of H4831 or 41-grains of IMR4350 in a medium .243 case?
When cleaning my rifles I find no indication of unburn powder on the patch. Or another comparison is that my barrel is no dirtier with my standard primer loads then it is when firing factory ammunition.