Author Topic: Ruger No 1 .223  (Read 1252 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline patw

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Avid Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 212
Ruger No 1 .223
« on: January 05, 2009, 08:25:27 AM »
I do not need a new rifle, and I should know better than to walk by the used gun rack....
However, I did, and I saw a No 1 in .223, looks like heavy bbl, mfg in 1995 from serial number.  It has a Bushnell Banner  variable scope, I thought 7x16, but when I looked it up found no such animal, I must have not seen all the numbers.  Maybe a 6x18.  The asking price is 400 dollars.  I am hoping someone will tell me that is too much, or that they are not accurate in that caliber.  It would help me resist temptation. 

Offline backstrap

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 646
  • Gender: Male
Re: Ruger No 1 .223
« Reply #1 on: January 06, 2009, 11:25:50 PM »
Well i am sorry to tell u that i dont think its to much for a #1 in good shape.here a new number 1 runs 8 to 9 hundred dollers,and i would think it would be acurate in the 223 round,so i say go for it
1 shot 1 kill

Offline Tunaman

  • Trade Count: (6)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 464
Re: Ruger No 1 .223
« Reply #2 on: January 07, 2009, 04:03:02 AM »
I wouldn't be able to pass that up. You are stronger than I am.

Offline BlkHawk73

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1501
  • Gender: Male
Re: Ruger No 1 .223
« Reply #3 on: January 07, 2009, 01:45:54 PM »
  A $400 good shape #1 and you didn't buy it???  You wearing a white coat and have your arms tied?
"Never Surrender, Just Carry On."  - G.S.

Offline Hairtrigger

  • Trade Count: (10)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2010
Re: Ruger No 1 .223
« Reply #4 on: January 07, 2009, 04:10:50 PM »
The cheepest No.1 I have purchased is a 220 Swift that has bluing wear on the barrel... $395 out the door.

Offline woodchukhntr

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (108)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2359
Re: Ruger No 1 .223
« Reply #5 on: January 08, 2009, 02:00:48 PM »
I had one and stupidly traded it.  It shot 3/4" groups without any work on it.  If you don't take it, please PM me with dealer information, I'd like a crack at it.

Offline SM Outdoors

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 66
  • Gender: Male
Re: Ruger No 1 .223
« Reply #6 on: January 09, 2009, 06:20:09 AM »
Every day of the week and twice on Sunday!!!!
Blessed be the lord my strength which teacheth my hands to war,
and my fingers to fight.
Psalm 144:1

Offline Jeff H

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (13)
  • Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 258
Re: Ruger No 1 .223
« Reply #7 on: February 02, 2009, 01:59:06 PM »
I got a No. 3 in .223 about seven or eight years ago off the "used" rack at an upscale shotgun store in NW Ohio.  It was exactly what I was looking for when I walked in and I walked right up to the rack, picked it off and did not set it down until I got to the counter.  My wife commented that I was rather sure of myself - knowing how I torture myself with such decisions under normal circumstances.  Fate and $350 converged and I didn't think twice.  I would take half a dozen more at that today. 

No box or papers but "like new" and no time wasted fouling the bore.  I knew it would not shoot well because I had always read that they wouldn't but it was a sweet little (heavy) rifle and my own Ruger single shot, so I didn't care - I had other rifles that will group under half an inch.  The No. 3 was a "just because" rifle, whether it shot "well" or not.

Boy, was I wrong!  By the time I ran a few loads, using various 60 grain HPs and SPs, I got a real education.  Using bulk surplus powder similar to H335, mixed, once-fired military brass and CCI small rifle primers, I was printing sub 1/2" groups (3-shots) over the hood of a 1958 F350.  Took it to a "real" range with a real bench and got the same results.

If I ever see another No.3 on the "used" rack, anywhere, for anything near $400 it will be mine.  I passed on two others the same year for about the same money, thinking it was a tad pricey for a "No. 1 understudy."  In hindsight - I should have bought all three, not just the one.  One of them would be wearing a 6.5x55 barrel by now but this one shoots so well I could not bear to have it re-bored/re-chambered.

It may have been pure stupid luck that this one shoots like it does but it was the single best firearms purchase I have made. 

Of course I probably should be telling you guys they stink - they literally give off bad odors when sitting in the rack, "pattern" poorly at 25 yards and made darn poor tomato stakes to boot.  On the other hand, kicking oneself in the rear with both feet is good aerobic exercise.

If it's not too late, go back and get that little gem.

Offline Hairtrigger

  • Trade Count: (10)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2010
Re: Ruger No 1 .223
« Reply #8 on: February 02, 2009, 03:10:53 PM »
Share the wealth.... Jaqua's Fine Guns is the only "upscale" shop in NW Ohio I can think of

Offline Jeff H

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (13)
  • Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 258
Re: Ruger No 1 .223
« Reply #9 on: February 02, 2009, 05:26:50 PM »
Share the wealth.... Jaqua's Fine Guns is the only "upscale" shop in NW Ohio I can think of

Exactly!

In Findlay.

Their "used" rack is a delight.  I have little interest in the other stuff they have but they are always personable even if I do head straight to the lower-priced trade-in department. 

Offline Hairtrigger

  • Trade Count: (10)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2010
Re: Ruger No 1 .223
« Reply #10 on: February 03, 2009, 12:17:54 AM »
Jaqua's has plenty of rifles, They have SO MANY shotguns that it seems the number of rifles is few but not so. The number of rifles is way more than most shops.

Offline patw

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Avid Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 212
Re: Ruger No 1 .223
« Reply #11 on: February 21, 2009, 02:36:39 AM »
As a follow up, I went back the next day and it was gone.  Been kicking myself ever since.  I am not sure who was more nuts, the guy who put it up on the rack with that price, or me who did not get it on the spot.  I also remember seeing a nylon 66, and it was gone the next day too.