Author Topic: Ridgeline  (Read 4158 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Drilling Man

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3637
Re: Ridgeline
« Reply #30 on: October 17, 2008, 01:21:19 PM »
  I've been doing some logging for a friend, he's had one of those Ridgelines for over a year now.  I tease him and call it a puzzy truck, but i have to tell you, it's been trouble free, and goes very good off road.  We drove into where i was logging with my MFWD tractor and back out without any problem at all...

  It seems to be a good vehicle, and he likes it a lot...

  DM

Offline hotrunner

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 102
Re: Ridgeline
« Reply #31 on: December 28, 2008, 06:46:57 PM »
This farm kid used to laugh at the Ridgeline...yuppie truck, uglier than an Avalanche, etc. Then I started looking for a true mid-size pickup; there are no others. Chevy had a good-looking one on the drawing-board a couple years ago  (not the Colorado) and the Dodge Dakota is still just a bigger mini (tow cap. w/a V-6: 3700# vs 55K for the Honda.) The Ford Sport-Trac is far less of a real truck than the R-Line--can't even put a Class 3 hitch on that chopped Explorer. Wanted something user-friendly enough for my wife to take her 90-year-old mother to the doc on a snowy day but rugged enough to run across fields and through woods for hunting. After the farmer next door bought his second Ridgeline and let me drive it, I broke down and bought a nice used '06 and, for a daily driver, I wouldn't trade it for any Big 3 4WD pickup. I drive munucipal plow trucks, and that little Honda tracks, goes and stops as good as any vehicle I've driven in snow. The rev-happy OHC V-6 and gear-hunting 5-speed automatic can, depending on one's mood, be fun or annoying; the cab is fairly spacious; I've never seen a bob-tailed crew cab pickup that can be called good-looking, but that razor-back styling becomes more tolerable every day.
Also, most of the used Ridgelines coming up for sale in this area have unusually high miles for their ages, and they seem to sell fairly quickly, maybe mostly because they're perceived as an economy truck (although gas mileage isn't as good as expected; I've heard it actually improves with more miles on the engine but can't prove it.)
All in all, I'd bet 1/2 of the pickup owners out there would be satisfied with a Ridgeline if they actually owned one.

Offline hotrunner

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 102
Re: Ridgeline
« Reply #32 on: December 28, 2008, 07:06:22 PM »
Oops...meant the Rideline tow cap. to be 5500 lbs., or 5.5K (not 55.)

Offline Victor3

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (22)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4241
Re: Ridgeline
« Reply #33 on: December 30, 2008, 12:42:50 AM »
 I looked hard at them. Spent a lot of time at the dealership and took two test drives. Solid, comfortable, fair amount of poop and smooth as glass on the road. Great reviews, even from some guys on the off-road forums. I love my 2000 Accord, and would buy a new one if I needed a car. Hondas are great vehicles.

 However, read the stats/reviews concerning damage to the lower control arms (or simply look at how low they are) and associated suspension/driveline parts if you plan on doing "off-roading" on much more than a gravel driveway. If you need more than 6" of ground clearance you'll probably end up with a Tacoma like I did...
"It is a capital mistake to theorize before one has data. Insensibly, one begins to twist facts to suit theories, instead of theories to suit facts."

Sherlock Holmes