Author Topic: Performance comparison of 209 x .45 vs. 209 x .50 cal. MLs  (Read 454 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline kody

  • Trade Count: (26)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 564
Performance comparison of 209 x .45 vs. 209 x .50 cal. MLs
« on: December 20, 2008, 10:54:14 AM »
   My son has an Encore and mentioned getting a ML barrel for next deer season. I have used a .50 cal. sidehammer for 35 years and haven't kept up on the inline assortment of manufacturers ,models etc. but I have seen the addition of the 209x .45 and then noticed the diminished ads for them and their scarcity in the stores. I realize the advantages of supply assortment in .50 cal. but have to ask about the performance differences between the two so I can pass what I learn on to him and even help him acquire some of the components.     Ken

Offline DennyRoark

  • Trade Count: (6)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 501
  • Gender: Male
    • The Ohio Outdoorsman
Re: Performance comparison of 209 x .45 vs. 209 x .50 cal. MLs
« Reply #1 on: December 21, 2008, 04:36:19 PM »
Kody, in most of the load data I have seen, the .45 will shoot a 200 or 180gr bullet a little faster and flatter that a 50 with the same bullet.  But at 100 yds with the 45, your talking an inch or so and still less energy than the 50.  Meat and potatoes testing... the 45 with a 200 gr shockwave killed them just as dead as the 250 gr from a 50, usually just as fast, at the same ranges (175 yds was my longest shot and it was from the 45).  If my Black Diamond wasn't such a pain to clean, I would have kept it (wish I did!).
Denny
Denny Roark
Member of PETA (People Eating Tasty Animals)
The Second Amendment...the one that makes all the others possible
I have no problems with vegetarians...I eat them regularly-Ted Nugent
"The beauty of the second amendment is that it will not be needed until they try to take it." -Thomas Jefferson