Author Topic: CH Press (photo's)  (Read 2181 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline EVOC ONE

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1373
  • Gender: Male
CH Press (photo's)
« on: December 11, 2008, 01:27:48 PM »
Hello Everyone.

I recently picked up a box of used loading equipment.  Included was a CH press.  I've used CH dies but am unfamiliar with their presses.  Any info the can be provided would be great. 

How does it compare to a modern press?  Say ... a Rockchucker, RCBS Jr. etc.

The press needs a good cleaning but otherwise seems to be in decent shape.

Anyone have a suggestion of how to clean years of oil, powder residue, etc without damaging the moving parts? From the photo's, it looks to be rusted.  However, there is no rust, just dried oil or lube.

Thanks for your assistance.   :)



Offline Badnews Bob

  • Trade Count: (34)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2963
  • Gender: Male
Re: CH Press (photo's)
« Reply #1 on: December 11, 2008, 01:59:39 PM »
That thing sure looks stout enuff, Never seen one before thou. 8)
Badnews Bob
AE-2 USN retired

Offline spinafish

  • Trade Count: (24)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1161
  • Gender: Male
Re: CH Press (photo's)
« Reply #2 on: December 11, 2008, 04:08:25 PM »
I would blast it clean with some brake cleaner and then lube it in all the right places.  Shouldn't be any problem forming wildcats!
the most heartwreching words any man will ever hear
"depart from me, I never knew you"  Jesus
We may ignore, but we can nowhere evade the presence of God. The world is crowded with Him. He walks everywhere incognito.” C.S. Lewis

Offline John Traveler

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1359
Re: CH Press (photo's)
« Reply #3 on: December 11, 2008, 06:56:02 PM »
I have the twin to that press but in a four-station upper and lower die plates version.

The toggle links are somewhat skimpy (compared to an RCS Rockchucker) and even when using the center station (greatest support) for full-length rifle case resizing, it is springy and lacks the mechanical advantage for efficient use.  It is definitely not strong enough for bullet swaging or case forming.

For my purposes, it works fine for loading pistol cases.  Carbide dies, expander/decapper, powder measure, and seater/crimper stations make it suitable for manual progressive reloading of pistol ammo.

Cleaning that thing would be easiest if you know someone with an automotive parts cleaner machine.  Lacking that, brushing and wiping with paint thinner soaked rags would be best, followed by spray lube and detailed relubrication of high friction points.

C-H was a popular reloading press and accessory maker contemporary with Lyman, RCBS, Pacific, Ohaus, Redding, etc and WAY before Dillon was established.  They are still good, although slow, basic machines.
John Traveler

Offline John Traveler

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1359
Re: CH Press (photo's)
« Reply #4 on: December 11, 2008, 07:46:28 PM »
My mistake:  I thought CH was out of business, but apparently they are still alive and well!

www.CH4D.com

Apparently your single station H press is discontinued, but they still have other models.
John Traveler

Offline iiranger

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 491
Geo Herter, the Re: CH Press (photo's)
« Reply #5 on: December 12, 2008, 06:27:53 AM »
long winded, LONG WINDED, loved to complain that presses like this had too much flex, unlike his single stage press and that compromised accuracy. He also handled a single press with two holes... The advantage, before the progressive we know today at reasonable prices, was you set up a set of dies, say 3 for handgun, and finish the process without having to removed, replace and adjust dies. Most handgun it should be plenty. Maybe not the hottest .44 or larger. Rifle, not competition?, enough. As said, lame side for swaging or case forming... Enjoy it as intended. Piece of history. CH has been sold and resold many times. Each incarnation with which I have dealt has been very helpful. ENJOY. luck.

Offline Troyboy

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (41)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1220
  • Gender: Male
  • Work more talk less
Re: CH Press (photo's)
« Reply #6 on: December 12, 2008, 08:47:41 AM »
I think old tools have more "character" than new ones. Restore mount it and use it with the pride that it has loaded many a round before you. Brake cleaner and a rag after disassembly polish and lube paint and reassemble. Way cool find congrats!!!
.204 .22lr .22wm .25acp .223 5.56 .243 .25-06 6.5x55  .308  .300wbymag  7.5x54  7.62x25 7.62x39  338-06  9x19 .38spl  9x18 .45acp . 45-70 .500s&w 12rfl 12smb 20smb  .45lc 410smb .22hornet .280AI    Ask not what your country can do for you BUT what can YOU do for your country

Offline EVOC ONE

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1373
  • Gender: Male
Re: CH Press (photo's)
« Reply #7 on: December 12, 2008, 12:03:37 PM »
Thanks much for the replies and advice everyone. 

I appreciate its nostalgia.  It will have a fine home on the bench and will be used with the respect it deserves. 

 :)

Offline EVOC ONE

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1373
  • Gender: Male
Re: CH Press (photo's)
« Reply #8 on: December 15, 2008, 09:54:23 AM »
Today I spoke to an apparently "seasoned" gentleman at CH regarding the press.

It seems the press was manufactured between the late 40's and mid 60's, when it went out of production.

He commented that it is strong enough to load any cartridge but was not designed for case forming or swaging (right on the money John Traveler ;)). He added that he used to load .378 Weatherby ammo using the same model.

I also inquired about a set of CH .45 Colt dies that was included in the box of reloading equipment with the press.  The dies are chrome.  According the the gentleman, the fact that they are chrome indicates they were manufactured in the 1950's.  He added that chrome dies were not manufactured by CH after the 50's. 

Thought I might pass this along.

Many thanks for the info and comments.

 :)