Author Topic: Maybe I was wrong about the 92.. (Read 607 times)

1860 · « **on:** August 29, 2003, 02:41:54 AM »

Hi,

I've been a fan of the toggle link guns since befor CAS, the 73 being my prefered type. I recently picked up a couple of 92s in some gun deals, one a carbine the other a round bbl. rifle, both in 44-40.

That carbine is one slick little nice handling rifle, I mean it's fast, accurate and a dream to carry. The rifle is no pig either, and it's a tack driver. They both seem better balanced then their toggle linked counter parts and are certainly lighter. Only negative I can see is taking them apart, getting that bolt with the ejector thingie in and out is a real pain. Maybe it's because they are still new to me but when I wanna take a walk, I grab that 92 carbine and a pocket full of shells more often than not.

So what says you? Do you like the Toggle links or the new fangled 92s? And Why?

1860

Big Hext Finnigan · « **Reply #1 on:** August 29, 2003, 05:24:52 AM »

Howdy,

The 92 is the rifle that sounds like a cowboy gun, to me.
Strangely I don't own one right now, for CAS. My Grandfather's saddle gun lives on a pair of antlers on the wall. It is the reason I started in CAS.

I have found the Marlin 94 to be the rifle that works best for me, but I really want to like my 66 the best.. It could still happen.

Adios,
Hext

44 Man · « **Reply #2 on:** August 29, 2003, 08:05:35 AM »

You're right about the '92 carrying easier in the woods. I started my deer hunting career 42 years ago with an 1873 win in 32-20. It had the long octagon bbl and felt so heavy to this young kid that I thought it should have had wheels! I was so happy when Dad bought a '94 in 30-30 and I didn't have to carry that "old, heavy" gun anymore. We sold that "old" gun for $15 and was happy to get it. Dumb, Dumb, Dumb! 44 Man

howdy doody · « **Reply #3 on:** August 29, 2003, 08:41:02 AM »

I have been looking at the 92 also, since it isn' t allowed in cowboy classic though I wonder what the thinking of that is? I think they look real classic. I will never shoot CC anyways and might just get one of them when my ship comes in. :grin:

Cuts Crooked · « **Reply #4 on:** August 30, 2003, 10:38:40 PM »

I like the 92s because I can AFFORD them! The 73s, yaller boys, ' Henry's are all way to pricey fer my blood!

And I like that the 92's will handle full house loads for hunting! I bought my first Rossi many years ago for deer hunting with .357s. It could handle hot loads that would put a Mizzora deer down hard 'n fast and it was nice to pack in deep timber and brush!

Shorty · « **Reply #5 on:** August 31, 2003, 11:17:28 AM »

Did you know that, when Winchester brought out the '92, it was supposed to immediately replace the '73 in their line-up. Well, they kept getting orders for '73's in such a volume that they had to keep making them until the '20's! I guess those old-timers were just as "traditional" as we are today. :roll: I have two '66's, but no '92 :wink:

1860 · « **Reply #6 on:** September 03, 2003, 02:27:31 AM »

Finn,

I'm just the opposite, the Klink/clunk noise of a 73 is the sound that says "cowboy" to me.

44 man,

I just saw a 32-20/30" go for over 2K on Gunbroker, amazing... :roll: Remember when 97s were 80 dollar guns...and they had an inch of dust on them... :grin:

I went shooting Sunday, that little 92 is great. But when I really wanted to hit things, my favorite 73 still got the call. I think the extra wt. helps in my off hand shooting. I'd love to take the 92 deer hunting, when I get out of this no-rifle state I will...

1860

Billy Clanton · « **Reply #7 on:** September 07, 2003, 12:40:54 AM »

Howdy
I Love my M92's. Got a Winchester SRC and a hex barrel rifle in 32-20, a SRC in 44-40, an El Tigre (Spanish copy) in 44-40, and an EMF copy in .45 :wink:
Billy