Author Topic: Beretta colt Lightning  (Read 991 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline gdaddybill

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 10
Beretta colt Lightning
« on: February 10, 2009, 10:57:58 AM »
Just ordered a new Beretta Colt Lightning clone with the 20 inch barrel.  I presume this action is on the light side since it was designed with Cowboy Action Shooting in mind and it wasn't a terribly strong action design to begin with.  Anyone have any experience using this rifle for deer or hog hunting--at close range obviously?


Offline targshooter

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 491
Re: Beretta colt Lightning
« Reply #1 on: February 11, 2009, 02:27:20 AM »
gdaddybill,
In the late 1960s and early 1970s I hunted with an older gentleman in Maine. He used the family rifle for deer, a Colt Lightning in .44-40. I sighted it in for him and he would hunt the apple orchard (or what remained of such, as it was reverted to wild) behind the barn. In 1969, opening morning, he shot the only deer I ever saw him harvest from the woodshed attached to the back of his horse barn. The deer was a midsized buck and was fairly close, stopping about 20 yards or so from the back of the barn to eat apples. I did not see the shot (I was back in along the edge of a swamp, far beyond the walking capabilities of this older fellow), but the bloody spot where it fell, kicked and died was evident on the frosty ground. When I returned he already had it in the barn and we hung and butchered it. He hit it near the heart in the lungs and great vessels, but the heart was edible, and we enjoyed it that evening along witht he backstrap steaks his wife prepared. I would assume at the range of 50 yards and under, the .44.40 or some similar cartridge would be as capable a deer/hog harvester as the .44 Mag  Ruger Deerfield I own (a good one shot killer if the field of fire is clear of brush and the range is 100 yards or under), and the results I witnessed in Maine that year seem to bear this out.

Offline gdaddybill

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 10
Re: Beretta colt Lightning
« Reply #2 on: February 12, 2009, 03:00:56 PM »
Thanks for the fascinating story.  I'm sure this rifle (in it's new version) hasn't had much time in the hunting fields.  I pick it up tomorrow and will ask about safe loads, etc.  In 45 Colt it should be equal to the 44-40 so I will report back when I have a chance to try it out.  I've worked up several handloads in the single action colt range but will try to emphasis the slower powders like AA # 9 to see if I can get a few more fps out of the 20 inch barrel.

Offline targshooter

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 491
Re: Beretta colt Lightning
« Reply #3 on: February 12, 2009, 04:38:44 PM »
Glad you enjoyed the story. The rifle chimes up in my memory as having been well balanced and easy to point; but all I shot was empty paint cans and 1 sunning woodchuck with it. If you are shooting lead bullets I offer the following. I used to take a Ruger Blackhawk .45 LC hunting in Maine, and shot a deer with it using a 255 grain Lyman "Keith" style bullet. Worked quite well. The bullet has a large meplat and one shot killed a big doe at 40 yards. I have a similar style bullet in my .44 Mag Ruger Vaquero. I did find the large meplat and sharp edges of the lubricating bands on the "Keith" style bullets was not appreciated by the Winchester 94 Trapper; proper cycling through the feeding mechanism was an iffy proposition. So, you may want to use the traditional small meplat .45 bullet, which also lacks the sharp edged lubrication bands, in the rifle as a starting load.