Author Topic: Civil War era fireing mechinism  (Read 669 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline bilmac

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (14)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3560
  • Gender: Male
Civil War era fireing mechinism
« on: March 13, 2009, 06:44:29 PM »
I was watching a story on Pickett's charge on the military channel tonight. The cannon they were firing were being fired with a lanyard, but I couldn't see any kind of lockwork on the breech of the guns. I assume they were fired with some sort of percussion cap. Was this recessed into the breech, or just so small I couldn't see it?

Offline GGaskill

  • Moderator
  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5668
  • Gender: Male
Re: Civil War era firing mechanism
« Reply #1 on: March 13, 2009, 06:58:58 PM »
Most likely they were using friction primers which are not mechanical and also not very big.  See the bottom of this page for some details.
GG
“If you're not a liberal at 20, you have no heart; if you're not a conservative at 40, you have no brain.”
--Winston Churchill

Offline bilmac

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (14)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3560
  • Gender: Male
Re: Civil War era fireing mechinism
« Reply #2 on: March 14, 2009, 06:30:01 PM »
I believe you are right G.  That table of fire is something. That's a far far cry from shooting a modern cannon. I was in a Guard unit with 155s for awhile. I bet shootin the old babys by the seat of your pants and as an art form would be a blast.

Offline subdjoe

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3036
  • Gender: Male
Re: Civil War era fireing mechinism
« Reply #3 on: March 15, 2009, 06:29:12 AM »
I believe you are right G.  That table of fire is something. That's a far far cry from shooting a modern cannon. I was in a Guard unit with 155s for awhile. I bet shootin the old babys by the seat of your pants and as an art form would be a blast.

Laying your gun was a pretty well developed science by the Late Unpleasantness.  There were tables to help you estimate range - troops at 2000 yards looked like this, you could see thus and such at 1500 yards, and so on.  You knew from the table of fire the elevation.  A good gunner could put steel on target within two or three rounds with a rifled gun. 

There were even range finders for sharpshooter.  A brass card with a tapered slot in it and a slider.  I think it was based on a man 5' 8" tall.  There was a string with a button on it. You bit down on the button, extended the card to the limit of the string, moved the slider to where the man you were looking at touched the top and bottom of the slot, then read your range off of it.  Got you close (say within about 20 yards, which was good enough to set your sights) anyway. 
Your ob't & etc,
Joseph Lovell

Justice Robert H. Jackson - It is not the function of the government to keep the citizen from falling into error; it is the function of the citizen to keep the government from falling into error.

Offline bilmac

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (14)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3560
  • Gender: Male
Re: Civil War era fireing mechinism
« Reply #4 on: March 15, 2009, 02:49:21 PM »
There was a thread the other day about laser and other range finders and all I could think of was optical convergance finders. The range finder you describe is a good scientific way to estimate range.

Offline subdjoe

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3036
  • Gender: Male
Re: Civil War era fireing mechinism
« Reply #5 on: March 15, 2009, 04:46:06 PM »
Here is a link to an image that shows one such thing. This is fancier than what I have seen before, but operates the same way.

http://www.brettschulte.net/CWBlog/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/silverstadia.jpg


and here is some information on it: http://www.brettschulte.net/CWBlog/2008/11/10/a-silver-stadia/#more-2067



Your ob't & etc,
Joseph Lovell

Justice Robert H. Jackson - It is not the function of the government to keep the citizen from falling into error; it is the function of the citizen to keep the government from falling into error.

Offline bilmac

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (14)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3560
  • Gender: Male
Re: Civil War era fireing mechinism
« Reply #6 on: March 15, 2009, 06:07:23 PM »
Sophistocated stuff but I imagine the soldier had enough stuff to drag around. And how do you get an enemy soldier to come out and stand up straight with nothing blocking your view.

Offline GGaskill

  • Moderator
  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5668
  • Gender: Male
Re: Civil War era firing mechanism
« Reply #7 on: March 15, 2009, 08:56:05 PM »
And how do you get an enemy soldier to come out and stand up straight with nothing blocking your view.

He does that by his own volition when he thinks you are not there or out of range.
GG
“If you're not a liberal at 20, you have no heart; if you're not a conservative at 40, you have no brain.”
--Winston Churchill

Offline Victor3

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (22)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4241
Re: Civil War era firing mechanism
« Reply #8 on: March 15, 2009, 11:31:44 PM »
And how do you get an enemy soldier to come out and stand up straight with nothing blocking your view.

He does that by his own volition when he thinks you are not there or out of range.

 ;D

 A personal account from a Korean War Vet friend confirms this. It involved a halftrack mounted Quad 50 and a one mile distant cloud of dust.

http://www.antiaircraft.org/aaimages/M16.jpg
"It is a capital mistake to theorize before one has data. Insensibly, one begins to twist facts to suit theories, instead of theories to suit facts."

Sherlock Holmes

Offline subdjoe

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3036
  • Gender: Male
Re: Civil War era fireing mechinism
« Reply #9 on: March 16, 2009, 04:13:52 AM »
Sophistocated stuff but I imagine the soldier had enough stuff to drag around. And how do you get an enemy soldier to come out and stand up straight with nothing blocking your view.

Well, since those range finders are about the size of a playing card and were a standard issue with the Berdans, they really weren't a lot to lug around.  Plus I would imagine that people got kind of good at estimating range, and coming up with work arounds (ok, he is kneeling, so he is about half as tall, card says 350 yards, soooo...yeah, sights set to 700, aim for the belt buckle). 

But, more than likely it was mostly done by eye.  You knew that certain things could be seen at certain ranges.  The famous "Dont fire until you see the whites of their eyes" was a kind of standard order.  You can see the whites of eyes at about 20 yards.  You can see the eyes as points at about 100 yards (I think I have that right).  With a bit of practice, you can come pretty close in your estimates.  Good enough to adjust your sights and get hits.

I've played with reproductions and checked what they say against a laser rangefinder, and they were pretty close.  At what the laser said was about 830 yards, I got about 850 with a stadia.  Again, plenty close enough.
Your ob't & etc,
Joseph Lovell

Justice Robert H. Jackson - It is not the function of the government to keep the citizen from falling into error; it is the function of the citizen to keep the government from falling into error.

Offline Cannoneer

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3950
Re: Civil War era firing mechanism
« Reply #10 on: March 16, 2009, 04:37:24 AM »
And how do you get an enemy soldier to come out and stand up straight with nothing blocking your view.

He does that by his own volition when he thinks you are not there or out of range.

 ;D

 A personal account from a Korean War Vet friend confirms this. It involved a halftrack mounted Quad 50 and a one mile distant cloud of dust.

http://www.antiaircraft.org/aaimages/M16.jpg

I've read a few books on the Korean Conflict, and they've made mention of how "quad fifties" mounted on "deuce and a halfs" (sounds like a math lesson) were used with good effect to clear hillside caves of their Chinese inhabitants.
RIP John. While on vacation July 4th 2013 in northern Wisconsin, he was ATVing with family and pulled ahead of everyone and took off at break-neck speed without a helmet. He lost control.....hit a tree....and the tree won.  He died instantly.

The one thing that you can almost always rely on research leading to, is more research.