Okay Andy, here it be!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/34eee/34eeed6887618c991927e70cfaf500ab5b6a6be4" alt="Grin ;D"
Let me just whip this thing out... your target and my notes that is...
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1f5cf/1f5cf1b0afb45a0437e1172ff5a1797cd5a3fb1e" alt="Roll Eyes ::)"
I'll try to take a picture of the target if I can figure out how to do close ups again, but for now:
3/5/09, 3 - 4 pm, 60 degrees, sunny, light wind blowing down range.
NEF Handi Rifle, 22" barrell, throated. Barrel was sighted in and fouled with several rounds prior to firing groups. During firing barrel never became any more then slightly warm. 3 - 3 shot groups were fired at 100 yards.
All rounds loaded with 28 gr. of 2400, bullets used were 350 gr. Hornady RNFP's. OAL was 2.55"
Grp #1: Load as above, NO crimp: Average Velocity = 1512 fps; Average Deviation = 29 fps; Grp size = 1.6 inches.
Grp #2: Load as above, Bullet crimped with Lee Factory Crimp: Average Velocity = 1482 fps; Average Deviation = 33 fps; Grp size = 2.19 inches.
Grp #3: Load as above, Bullet crimped with Lee Factory Crimp and 1.5 gr. poly filler added: Average Velocity = 1468 fps; Average Deviation = 60 fps; Grp size = 2.72 inches.
Recoil was very mild from this load.
From this statistically
<in>significant sample we can draw a few
<completely unfounded> conclusions:
1. In group #1, 2 bullets, No.'s 2 & 3, landed about a half inch from each other. Bullet No. 1 was about an inch higher. Obvious case of shooter error and this is a half inch or better load. As futher proof of this you will see if and when I post the picture that if hole # 1 was moved down approximately 1.25 inches the resulting group would be a perfect half inch triangle!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/34eee/34eeed6887618c991927e70cfaf500ab5b6a6be4" alt="Grin ;D"
2. Groups number 2 & 3, while still nicely triangular in shape, thereby proveing their validity BTW, progressively opened up, slowed down and the velocity deviation increased. These observations lead this rational tryer of inference to believe that (a) crimping has an adverse effect on velocity, accuracy and consistency, and adding a filler aggrivates this tendency.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5c2fc/5c2fc18dedfde104585dc24eeee2c25c27886a0e" alt="Shocked :o"
Therefore Andy old pal, I can say without hesitation or doubt, that your pet load, as you shoot it, that is w/o crimp or filler, is a mild recoiling, 1500 fps, 1/2 inch load!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/34eee/34eeed6887618c991927e70cfaf500ab5b6a6be4" alt="Grin ;D"
I wouldn't change a thing!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/81038/810380aff619ab77e688f97a9004b7dbd5fc2cf9" alt="Cool 8)"