Author Topic: Hate crime legislation  (Read 258 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline DDZ

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6186
  • Gender: Male
Hate crime legislation
« on: April 28, 2009, 01:29:11 PM »
Homosexual activists, unable to persuade even the people of Calif. To change the definition of marriage to legitimize their lifestyle, are resorting to a backdoor approach to accomplish the same thing: pushing federal hate crime legislation while few are paying attention.

We better wake up because the House Judiciary committee has already approved Barney Franks bill, H.R. 1913. The full House is expected to vote on the bill April 29th . Various liberal groups, liberal religious organizations, and gay activists are engaged in a full court press to get this bill passed.

The bill would make it a federal crime to willfully cause bodily injury to someone, because of his or her sex orientation or gender identity.

The bill violates the constitutional guarantee of equal protection by the notion that certain groups of citizens such as homosexuals are entitled to greater legal protection than others.

Most likely the purpose of this bill is to criminalize thought, especially politically incorrect belief that homosexual behavior is either abnormal or sinful. It is to make a statement that this belief constitutes “hate” and possibly to lay the groundwork for outlawing speech expressing this belief, including from the pulpit.

The practice of criminalizing peaceful expression of this belief has already occurred in other nations, including Sweden, Canada, and Great Britain, and even in our own Philadelphia.

New York City authorities ordered the removal of billboards, that display various biblical versions of Leviticus 18:22 “Do not lie with a man as one lies with a women; this is detestable”. Staten Island Borough President  Guy Molinari condemned the language  in the displayed verse as “mean-spirited” and “hate speech”

Irrespective of your opinion on Homosexual behavior, it is a distortion of the English language to say that it is hateful to believe it is somehow abnormal or sinful. One can disapprove of behavior without hating those engaging in it; indeed the Bible exhorts Christians to love not hate. If you want to witness a clinic in “hate”, watch the You Tube video of homosexual Perez Hilton trashing Miss Calif. He called her vile names and may have caused her to lose the Miss USA title. Now that’s an example of direct harm inflicted on one because of her beliefs. It is not often opinionated heterosexuals doing the hating, harassing, thought control intimidation, and speech chilling these days, but militant homosexual activists.

Lovers of free speech and free exercise of religion should awaken to the relentless effort of radical homosexual activists to validate their lifestyle by criminalizing and silencing those who disagree with them.

Far too many people , including certain well meaning Christians laboring under the belief that Christians must avoide politics, are failing to stand up to this intimidation. This failure could eventually lead to the unintended consequence of their loss of the very freedom to evangelize.         

When will the Chruch make a stand and say enough is enough?
Those people who will not be governed by God will be ruled by tyrants.    Wm. Penn

Offline ncsurveyor

  • Trade Count: (24)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 821
Re: Hate crime legislation
« Reply #1 on: April 28, 2009, 03:32:52 PM »
Recently, the Salem Presbytery of North Carolina, and quite a few others, passed an amendment to the Book of Order that's intent was to allow homosexuals to be ordained.  The measure failed a National vote, thankfully.

The process by which this was going to happen was to remove the absolute restriction currently in the by-laws against practicing homosexuals being ordained, along with removing the requirement for the repentance of self acknowledged sin in general by candidates for ordainment. 

In this fashion, the fact that homosexuality is a sin was moot, as would be any sin.  You could still be ordained, regardless of the sins you are unrepentant for, as long as a congregation is satisfied that your intent to serve Christ is genuine.

And despite bearing no hate for anyone, society has made it that anyone citing a religious objection to the lifestyle of homosexuals is seen as intolerant and an extremist.

Quote
Far too many people , including certain well meaning Christians laboring under the belief that Christians must avoide politics, are failing to stand up to this intimidation. This failure could eventually lead to the unintended consequence of their loss of the very freedom to evangelize.   

Despite the uproar amongst some of the congregation, I do not expect the issue to be brought up to the general membership, which is likely to be against the amendment, although many of the pastors, and "educated" members providing pastoral responsibilities do not seem to have a problem with the amendment and its intent.

With upwards of 15% of the presbyteries changing their vote from "against" the amendment last year to "for" this year, I suspect that most are hoping the fervor will go away until it can be voted on again next year.

An activist society has a foothold in your church.  What will you do?

Offline Syncerus

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 313
Re: Hate crime legislation
« Reply #2 on: April 29, 2009, 02:30:41 AM »
I'm opposed to "hate crime" legislation. It's like saying, "we don't try to enforce the laws that we already have, but this time we really, really mean it."

Just enforce the existing laws and stop talking.
Don't vote for Socialists.