Matt, Dario here:
Hopefully, this is the last time I email you about "getting Roy out" as he has his arraingment to morrow at 9:00 AM.
That way... we can focus on "the cure for cancer" and the rest of the rEvolution...
_________________________________________________
From:
http://TheChicagoTribune.com_________________________________________
THIS IS A PROSECUTOR'S AND REPORTER'S DREAM COME TRUE:
I show this to you pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3 & 18 U.S.C. § 4and the Constitution for the United States to make you aware of crimes in progress. As a first hand witness, I swear, under penalty of perjury and with full commercial liability, that what I report herein is the truth and nothing but the truth. Hope you're not "chicken" or let "local politics" stand in the way of reporting the truth and obeying the law as a journalist or free press) - Dario Busch (see case files link below) _________________________________________
GUANTANAMO BAY MOVES TO TROY, MISSOURI?
KIDNAPPERS KEEP VICTIM HIDDEN FROM MEDIA?
AND... 4TH OF JULY IS “IRONICALLY APROACHING”?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
May 22nd, Roy Stang (a real man) got Kidnapped by "armed criminals" because Roy Stang flied Criminal Complaints against Ben Burkemper (which is not a real Judge). (Entire file enclosed, link below | this is just an outline, not the article) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1) Roy Stang filed a criminal complaint against Ben Burkemper (junior associate judge) because Ben Burkemper violated Roy Stang's rights and denied Roy due process.
2) Roy Stang got falsely accused for "tampering with judicial officer", basically, harassment, in retaliation for Roy Stang filing a criminal complaint against Ben Burkemper. (See complaint in the case file)
3) Roy Stang has been arrested "under color of law", technically KIDNAPPED, for over 20 days so far... ? (Since May 22nd 2009)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Yes... I agree.... It is an outrage... Tyranny?
We all have the Constitutionally protected right to file criminal complaints against ANYONE that violates our rights... no matter if they are rich, poor, judge, or robber.
This is not just about Roy... it is CONSTITUTIONALLY FUNDAMENTAL!
Next time, it can be Your Constitutionally Protected Rights (YCPR) being violated... and when you file a complaint... you get kidnapped and terrorized to “drop that complaint”?
Locked up without your "day in court"? (without due process?)
NO... that is NOT America!
Rule by Force?..... Are We a Free People (?)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
MAXIM #1:
We have been told, over and over again, by our Presidents and forefathers, that we live in a "free and open society" where "secrecy is repugnant" and we are all equal in "the rule of law" (You know, The Free Country our forefathers died for).
MAXIM #2:
We have been told that when anyone violates one's rights,one has the constitutionally protected right to file a complaint and prosecute (That is why places like the Disciplinary Council, Commission on Retirement and Discipline, the FBI, the ACLU, Sheriff, Prosecutor, Courts, and the Grand Jury are in place).
MAXIM #3:
“Officers of the court have no immunity, when violating a constitutional right from liability for they are deemed to know the law.” Owen v. Independence, 100 S. Ct. 1398.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
THE PROCESS OF "FILING A COMPLAINT" IS SIMPLE
Sworn under penalty of perjury and with full commercial liability, one files a probable cause statement and a complaint specifying the violations (counts) and the prosecution begins. Just like when the Prosecutor charges you with a crime or violation (Simple and clear).
However, this was not the case with Roy Stang (Troy, Missouri), when Roy Stang filed a criminal complaint, he got falsely charged with “tampering with judicial officer” and arrested, which, being false charges, constitutes kidnapping.
*************************************************
Is Ben Burkemper and the Prosecutor, by filing a false charge against Roy Stang, saying to The American People:
“If you get caught by us committing a crime, you go to jail, but if you catch us committing a crime, YOU go to jail"?
(Tearing apart the Constitution for the United States in “small little pieces?)
*************************************************
Roy Stang stands firm on his Constitutionally protected rights which have been severely violated since May 22nd 2009. Roy Stang demands the prosecution and imprisonment of of Ben Burkemper and accomplices while unlawfully confined (Kidnapped, by definition) against his consent in a "corporate warehouse" known as Lincoln County Jail
Roy Stang's has every reason to believe that his life is in danger. The violent retaliation against Roy Stang exercising his Constitutionally Protected Rights (Like all Americans have the right to) by filing a criminal complaint against Ben Burkemper shows it clearly.
After all, you are presumed innocent until proven guilty but a false allegation makes them treat Roy Stang like a convicted criminal?
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
When READING the Statutes, it is clear. According to § 565.110, RSMo, Roy Stang is currently kidnapped in Lincoln County Jail and Ben Burkemper and associates are criminals in violation of (but not limited to) § 565.110, RSMo, a class A felony, Aggravated Kidnapping, punishable upon conviction under (but not limited to) § 558.011 and § 560.011, RSMo, for unlawfully removing Roy Stang from the place he was found, kidnapping Roy Stang, and confining him against his consent inside the corporate facility out of control known as “Lincoln County Jail” for the purpose of Holding Roy Stang for ransom or reward, or for any other act to be performed or not performed for my return or release; and/or Using Roy Stang as a shield or as a hostage; and/or Interfering with the performance (Due process) of governmental or political function; and/or Facilitating the commission of any felony or flight thereafter; and/or Inflicting physical injury on and terrorizing Roy Stang and others, and any other reason that may be deemed appropriate based upon the facts sworn to herein.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
THIS IS NO BULL:
You go through the court case files yourself and you will see clearly. It is in plain English. This is a “classroom example of” tyrannical "railroading" of the People.... right here... right now! "Gestapoish"?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Here is the link to Roy's updated case file:
http://dariobusch.com/legal/case/STATE-v-STANG-09L6-CR00749~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I thank you for all the support you are giving Roy, let's get him OUT!
OK... see you on the conference call?...
... what.... you chicken?
If not Freedom... then WHAT?
And if not NOW... then WHEN?
Sincerely,
Dario Busch
http://TheChicagoTribune.com_________________________________________
THIS IS A PROSECUTOR'S AND REPORTER'S DREAM STORY:
I show this to you pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3 & 18 U.S.C. § 4and the Constitution for the United States to make you aware of crimes in progress. As a first hand witness, I swear, under penalty of perjury and with full commercial liability, that what I report herein is the truth and nothing but the truth. Hope you're not "chicken" or let "local politics" stand in the way of reporting the truth and obeying the law as a journalist or free press) - Dario Busch _________________________________________
C:LARIFICATION ABOUT BEING AWARE OF A CRIME:
1.18 U.S.C. § 4 MISPRISION OF FELONY:
Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.
18 U.S.C. § 3 ACCESSORY AFTER THE FACT:
Whoever, knowing that an offense against the United States has been committed, receives, relieves, comforts or assists the offender in order to hinder or prevent his apprehension, trial or punishment, is an accessory after the fact. Except as otherwise expressly provided by any Act of Congress, an accessory after the fact shall be imprisoned not more than one-half the maximum term of imprisonment or (notwithstanding section 3571) fined not more than one-half the maximum fine prescribed for the punishment of the principal, or both; or if the principal is punishable by life imprisonment or death.
In case you don't “want to” report this story, read:
American Journalism and the Constitution (by: Tony Snow)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/588019/posts -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I am looking into this to try and get the whole story but it sounds like you should not try to sue a judge...
Matt
