Author Topic: '93 mauser  (Read 752 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline mrbigtexan

  • Trade Count: (7)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 594
'93 mauser
« on: May 31, 2009, 01:35:14 PM »
does anyone think this rifle would to weak to be rechambered to a 7.62x39? all info is appreciated.

Offline billy_56081

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (5)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8575
  • Gender: Male
Re: '93 mauser
« Reply #1 on: May 31, 2009, 01:50:50 PM »
As long as you can make the extractor work the gun should easily handle 7.62X39 pressures and backthrust.
99% of all Lawyers give the other 1% a bad name. What I find hilarious about this is they are such an arrogant bunch, that they all think they are in the 1%.

Offline Mikey

  • GBO Supporter
  • Moderator
  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8734
Re: '93 mauser
« Reply #2 on: June 01, 2009, 03:14:36 AM »
Should work.

Offline paulhoover

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 9
Re: '93 mauser
« Reply #3 on: June 01, 2009, 05:43:43 AM »
does anyone think this rifle would to weak to be rechambered to a 7.62x39? all info is appreciated.
Mine has worked fine with the MCA Adapter for 7.62x39.

Offline canon6

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (119)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1508
  • Gender: Male
Re: '93 mauser
« Reply #4 on: June 09, 2009, 04:48:16 PM »
e-gunparts , has a conversion set for the '93,magazine follower etc.They work well, may need some tweeking to get your rifle to work well, but it is a easy fix.     Doug
a armed man is his own master

Offline iiranger

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 491
Re: '93 mauser
« Reply #5 on: June 10, 2009, 10:15:26 AM »
Mr. De Haas, in Bolt Action Rifles, his book, has a standard I subscribe to. More for 98's but not bad advice. Pull the wood off and look hard under the front receiver ring. Should be able to find a proof mark with date. For more modern cartridges like .243 dates after 1920, 1930 to be extra careful in the '98.

b). 7.62x39 will be loaded to varying pressures depending on the source of the ammo. It is not the mid pressure cartridge of the early 1900's like 7x57, .303 Brit, etc. I would want a later dated action.
c). 7.62x39 is of smaller diameter than the Mauser standard. You will need an extractor adapted and magazine, thus the kit... AND the smaller diameter means that there will be less pressure exerted to the rear on the bolt face... simple physics. Reverse of the Contender handles the .223 at 55K CUP or so, but not the .308 at same pressures. This should also buy you some safety.

Assuming you are willing to work with these bounds, go for it. Real decent guns. Keep them working. Luck.

Offline blackpowderbill

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 287
  • Gender: Male
Re: '93 mauser
« Reply #6 on: June 11, 2009, 01:04:54 AM »
One other thing worth considering, although I have not tried it myself; the magazine. How well will it contain and feed the 7.62x39mm?
People are like slinkies, they serve no purpose yet they bring a smile to your face when you push them down the stairs.

Offline mrbigtexan

  • Trade Count: (7)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 594
Re: '93 mauser
« Reply #7 on: June 14, 2009, 05:05:30 PM »
it holds and feeds good, it is already a 6.5x55, i beleive it was rebarrelled from 7mm mauser.

Offline blackpowderbill

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 287
  • Gender: Male
Re: '93 mauser
« Reply #8 on: June 18, 2009, 04:46:43 AM »
I would not see any safety related problems with such a conversion. Most safety considerations with "pre 98" Mausers are more about the actions ability to handle escaping gas than with mechanical strength.  Many of the new patents issued to P. Mauser for his 1898 design had to do with gas protection. Some of them are very noticable, the gas flange on the boltshroud for example.
People are like slinkies, they serve no purpose yet they bring a smile to your face when you push them down the stairs.