Author Topic: Rolling Block Question  (Read 681 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Smithy

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Posts: 4
Rolling Block Question
« on: September 27, 2003, 08:40:48 PM »
Hi folks,
I went to the range today with my "new - slightly used" Pedersolli Rolling Block rifle.  It is a 45-70.  I loaded 50 rounds with 60 grains of FFg with a wonder wad and a thin beeswax cookie under a 300 grain flat nose bullet.  The rifle shoots better than I can see so I am basically happy with it.  My question is this:
The FFL I got it from is well known to me and I trust him.  When I asked why the former owner put the rifle on consignment my FFL said the guy was uncomfortable with the recoil and wanted something lighter.  OK, I think that sounds reasonable.  I probably should have looked the rifle over more carefully but it was virtually new and I let a detail slip by.  I am sure the FFL didn't see it either.
The steel in the hammer is so soft that the rebound from the firing pin is peening a major divot in the hammer face.  At first I thought the previous owner must have been shoothing some heavy smokeless loads but when I got home from the range today I checked and the divot is worse.
My FFL will stand behind the rifle but the darn thing is so great in every other respect I would like to keep it.  If I mess with the hamer face that would probably present a safety problem  - even though I do a lot of metal work.  I guess a new hammer is the way to go unless someone has a suggestion.
When I was a kid I had an original Remington rolling block in 7X57.  Shot it a lot and never saw anything like this.
PS After reading Ken's post I don't feel quite so bad.

Offline Car Knocker

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 13
Rolling Block Question
« Reply #1 on: September 28, 2003, 01:51:01 PM »
Might want to contact Pedersoli's US rep, Dick Trenk, at <dick trenk @ AOL .com> (remove spaces).

Offline Smithy

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Posts: 4
Rolling Block Question
« Reply #2 on: September 28, 2003, 07:52:23 PM »
Thanks