Really all they have to do is point out the obivious
SHOOTALL, not to conflict, and I do agree with you most times, but "THE OBVIOUS" was pointed out about folks like McCain, and people here voted McCain anyway, ignoring "THE OBVIOUS", and criticizing the ones that pointed "THE OBVIOUS" out to them.
I am in dialogue with you, not chastizement. We agree, I am just taking another angle.
I truly believe that if Palin had been at the head of the ticket she might have very well won, and the lessor of two evils would have been "vice president". The majority of CONCERVATIVE voters saw McCain for what he was the "first time" he ran, and wanted no part of him the "second time" as he had once again changed horse while standing in the creek.
Presidents are like guns. Buy a cheap one and it hits all over the place (i.e.McCain). Buy a good one, and it hits POA every time. Americans are simply going to have to stop settling for less.
Take Paul for instance. He did in fact introduce a bill to legalize drugs but, few looked deeper in to WHY he did so. Reason? He was attempting to take the money out of it. Real freedom is if you want to sit on your couch and stuff cocaine up your nose until your brain bubbles, it is after all, YOUR NOSE, and YOUR COUCH. Do I recommend it? Of course not. But, then again I don't recommend sitting on the same couch and drinking yourself into a stupor either.
As we all say, but many don't understand the actual concept. FREEDOM AIN'T FREE. It comes with responsibilities, like VOTING RESPONSIBLY, instead of for the "lessor of". Lessor does not mean freedom. It means "less freedom".JMO
