Author Topic: Navy Yard DC conservation  (Read 520 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Double D

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12607
  • SAMCC cannon by Brooks-USA
    • South African Miniature Cannon Club

Offline Cannoneer

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3950
Re: Navy Yard DC conservation
« Reply #1 on: November 09, 2009, 06:15:20 AM »
Yeah, we've covered this one before, Doug. The only (slight) problem with these specific conservators, is the fact that they take about a decade to complete work on each individual piece of ordnance they're entrusted with.
RIP John. While on vacation July 4th 2013 in northern Wisconsin, he was ATVing with family and pulled ahead of everyone and took off at break-neck speed without a helmet. He lost control.....hit a tree....and the tree won.  He died instantly.

The one thing that you can almost always rely on research leading to, is more research.

Offline dan610324

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2413
  • Gender: Male
  • bronze cannons and copper stills ;-))
    • dont have
Re: Navy Yard DC conservation
« Reply #2 on: November 09, 2009, 06:19:52 AM »
they will probably not notice the corrosion until its just the bores left 
Dan Pettersson
a swedish cannon maniac
interested in early bronze guns

better safe than sorry

Offline Double D

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12607
  • SAMCC cannon by Brooks-USA
    • South African Miniature Cannon Club
Re: Navy Yard DC conservation
« Reply #3 on: November 09, 2009, 06:57:53 AM »
I was just trying to cheer John up!  :)

There is hope.

Offline Double D

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12607
  • SAMCC cannon by Brooks-USA
    • South African Miniature Cannon Club
Re: Navy Yard DC conservation
« Reply #4 on: November 09, 2009, 06:59:50 AM »
Here is a link to information on how that gun got saved.

http://crm.cr.nps.gov/archive/24-03/24-03-2.pdf

Offline dan610324

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2413
  • Gender: Male
  • bronze cannons and copper stills ;-))
    • dont have
Re: Navy Yard DC conservation
« Reply #5 on: November 09, 2009, 07:39:25 AM »
I sure hope he will be able to get someone in a higher position to understand how very close they are to destroy an national treasure by their negligence
Dan Pettersson
a swedish cannon maniac
interested in early bronze guns

better safe than sorry

Offline cannonmn

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3345
Re: Navy Yard DC conservation
« Reply #6 on: November 09, 2009, 09:18:08 AM »
Thanks DD.  You can see my review of that job beginning at 5:55 on this video.  My problem with microcrystalline wax coating is that it doesn't last long. and that adfffthe guns at the WNY go for long periods between maintenence, probably decades.

That waxed cannon does a good job of demonstrating what's under the powdery green corrosion products on all the cannons there, and how much bronze has actually been lost.

[yt=425,350]-vHZh-M7xIw[/yt]

Offline Double D

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12607
  • SAMCC cannon by Brooks-USA
    • South African Miniature Cannon Club
Re: Navy Yard DC conservation
« Reply #7 on: November 09, 2009, 09:56:54 AM »
John,

Here is your write to guy, or rather Gal!

http://www.acq.osd.mil/ie/ie_bio_dusd-ie.shtml

Offline cannonmn

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3345
Re: Navy Yard DC conservation
« Reply #8 on: November 09, 2009, 11:40:33 AM »
Quote
Here is your write to guy, or rather Gal!

http://www.acq.osd.mil/ie/ie_bio_dusd-ie.shtml

Thanks, beenderedundat.  That's the first office I ever contacted a couple of years ago.  They did forward my inquiry to the base commander, who ignores it since they know they are not in charge of cannons, the service's historical-curator function is.   For the Army that was Dr. Clarke who did respond saying they had lots of other priorities and someday they'd have someone look into it.  But the green color wasn't a bad thing anyway, it just meant the cannons had formed an impervious protective coating, or some such bs.  The letter response is posted on this board but it was sometime back.