Guys, the speech, in my opinion, would have been innocuous regardless of the level of outrage. What is MUCH more concerning to me is that his speech sets precedence:
It's now OK to have politicians speak directly to our kids through our schools without parental consent. This speech is innocuous. What about 3 years, two months from now, when he pipes in his propoganda to the 18 year old seniors just before the election?
Parents will say, "Oh, that wasn't bad at all, he should do this all the time". Then the liberals have one more camel's head under the tent.