Author Topic: Winchester vs Marlin in 44  (Read 946 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Jim n Iowa

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 758
Winchester vs Marlin in 44
« on: October 08, 2003, 03:41:54 PM »
I have been working this over a lot. Having never owned a lever and not interested in cowboy, but a short range hog gun, and I am not waiting for the 480 Ruger any longer. What does this board recomend?In a 44 with out a scope what is the consense's also a short barrel. Will be reloading with hard cast bullets.
Jim

Offline DB Leath

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 386
Winchester vs Marlin in 44
« Reply #1 on: October 08, 2003, 03:59:18 PM »
Marlin...cost more but much shorter stroke as it was designed for a pistol length ctg the Wichester wasnt.   The Rossi isnt bad either...if cost was the issue...
SASS #49681
SBSS #1201
Ya have to back your brothers play

Offline les hemby

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 287
Winchester vs Marlin in 44
« Reply #2 on: October 08, 2003, 04:43:09 PM »
i have a 1894p and it is pretty much my favorite gun. they are just sweet. i have the 44 but wish i had 357 just like it, but i dont like the ports. a buddy of mine swears by the winchester. with either you will be happy,but i like the marlin. if i had to do over again i would buy older marlin (without safety) and have cut to 16.25 :grin: the ruger 4.58 SBH is closely gaining as favorite though

Offline Graybeard

  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (69)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26939
  • Gender: Male
Winchester vs Marlin in 44
« Reply #3 on: October 08, 2003, 06:34:26 PM »
Why would you have to wait on the .480? Rossi is making them and selling them under the Puma label now aren't they? Both .480 and .454 Casull as I understand it.

GB


Bill aka the Graybeard
President, Graybeard Outdoor Enterprises
256-435-1125

I am not a lawyer and do not give legal advice.

Jesus is the way, the truth, and the life anyone who believes in Him will have everlasting life!

Offline Jim n Iowa

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 758
44s
« Reply #4 on: October 09, 2003, 01:27:41 PM »
Graybeard
I started out with one 44mag pistol, got interested in hog hunting, traded off some old stuff and ended up with to many 44s. All the while being told Winchester was gping to produce a 480. So any who I think I will stay with a 44mag and get a lever. Be nice if they made a pump.
Jim

Offline Eric N.

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 76
Winchester vs Marlin in 44
« Reply #5 on: October 09, 2003, 04:24:36 PM »
If you want a handy 44Mag lever, find a 1894P. I have one and the ports dont bother me at all. It is one of my all time favs.

Offline Dakota Confederate

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 21
Winchester vs Marlin in 44
« Reply #6 on: October 09, 2003, 05:02:44 PM »
Given the choice between the Marlin 1894 and the Winchester 1894, both in pistol calbiers, I would go with the Marlin over the Winchester any day.  Reason is that the Marlin was designed from the begining to be chambered in pistol length cartridges.  The Winchester was designed around longer .38-55 and .30-30 cartridges.  The Winchester is a good gun in the caliber it was designed for but I've heard scads of functioning problems with the pistol caliber Winchester rifles among the SASS crowd while the Marlin is one of the top rifles in SASS where pistol calibers are being used.
My other reason for going with either a new Marlin over a new Winchester is that the idiot button on the Marlin can be removed with a $9 replacement pin that looks like a screw head.  Problem solved.  A lot of your Winchesters these days have an idiot button in a recessed crater in the side of the receiver that looks like crap! :x  Even if you could replace the idiot button, you are still left with that crater and rebounding hammer the lawyers thought Winchester ought to have on there to keep you from hurting yourself.  Funny, I grew up with an old Winchester .30-30 and never managed to blow my head off even without that god-send of an idiot button they put on them these days.  Hmm, must have been the safety in my head rather than a safety button on the gun. ;)  The latest generation of Winchesters have a sliding tang safety that is better but is still unneccessary and a rebounding hammer as well. :(  
Now if you want another option, Rossi makes a copy of the 1892 Winchester.  Here you have a Winchester rifle that was designed for pistol length cartridges and they work rather well.  Matter of fact, the Rossi 1892 is another very common rifle in SASS competition.  I happen to have an older Rossi carbine in .45 Colt and the wife has a rifle from EMF in .357 Magnum.  I've never had a problem with mine but the wife just got hers so it's too soon to tell if there are any problems with hers.  It doesn't seem to have a problem cycling .357 magnums through the action but how well it's going to shoot has yet to be seen.  If it's like mine, it should be pretty good.  If you want one with an idiot button, go with the Puma 1892 but if you want one like they were originally designed, go with an 1892 from either EMF or Navy Arms.

Offline hillbill

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3285
44 lever
« Reply #7 on: October 11, 2003, 08:33:46 PM »
hey didnt browning make a 92 in 44 at one time? was it jap construction or what. i have a 53 browning that is jap and the quality is very good. as far as marlin over winchester jeez just feel a marlin!! the action feels so much more solid, the wood is better and sights are better on certain rifles. what youall think?

Offline Dakota Confederate

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 21
Winchester vs Marlin in 44
« Reply #8 on: October 12, 2003, 02:32:10 AM »
Yup, Browning had built both the 1892 in .44 and .357 magnum and 1886 in .45-70 built several years ago that were considered the best rifles of the type made.  Lot of folks thought they were even better than teh originals.  Never had an 1892 Browning but I do have an 1886 and I can say that it's one SWEET rifle!!! :grin:

Offline John Y Cannuck

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 805
Winchester vs Marlin in 44
« Reply #9 on: October 12, 2003, 04:11:53 AM »
I'd take a very long look at the 1892 Winchester, in any of it's various  modern manufacturers forms before settling on anything else. My original '92 is the smoothest rifle I own. There is some evidence they are stronger than the '94 Winchester too.
Canadian Liberal Gov't = elected Dictatorship