I think it was suppossed to read that there are tea parties and fiscal conservatives... within the republican party... which DOES take down spending in lots of non-essential areas but also fails to stop the elephant from stomping around in the middle east and liberally wasting military assets. as for the fiscal conservatives indeed putting money into the media, they have to
I wish you would have asked me earlier, I'd look like less of a jerk too!
conservation of funds with an aim to remain a sustainable government is great, but conservation of force in a political campaign is likely to mean a loss so I do believe that the anti-commies did in fact turn a blind eye to some bailouts during bush's tenure- to appease them and get them going, but it backfired when obama got in and the same companies came right back- so while I don't believe that bush wanted to get the feds involved in running businesses, I do believe that he opened the door to the corporatist opportunism that obama went wild with.... I think bush usually had his heart in the right place but he wasn't particularly gifted as a politician
it seems to me that they tried to fight fire with fire and lost (like firefighters using selective burning to stop a fire's advance) because when he "burnt" the greedy so to speak, he didn't do a very good job, and those greedy persons lit right back up