Yes, there is a scarcity of available load data for Blue Dot in large pistol calibers.
You know, I am not wedded to the use of BlueDot in everything, it is just one of a great many powders I use. But when I read comments like the one above I have to wonder on what planet the poster lives. The following manuals list numerous loads with BlueDot for the bullets shown:
Hornady #6:
.41 Mag - 210
.44 SPL - 240
.44 Mag - 180/200/240/265/300
.45WM - 200/250
Speer #14:
.41 Mag - 200/210/220
.44 SPL - 240
.44 Mag - 200
.45LC - 225/260
Nosler #5:
.41 Mag - 210
.44 SPL - 240
.44 Mag - 240
.45LC - 250
Sierra #V:
.41 Mag - 170/210
.44 Mag - 180/210/220/240/250/300
.45LC - 240/300
Lyman #48:
.41 Mag - 210/220
.44 SPL - 210
.44 Mag - 180/200/225/240/265/300
.45LC – 185
We see that all the major loading manuals list plenty of loads with BlueDot for large handgun cartridges. So what the poster really meant to say was:
“Yes, there is a huge amount of available load data for Blue Dot in large pistol calibers”.
If BlueDot was as dangerous as he claims, why would all the above manuals show it as a safe, recommended load? Why would Alliant recommend it for .44 Magnum and .45 LC loads if it was in anyway unsafe? Answer - they would not.
.