... at least that's what the headlines are saying. I expect full well it will take forever, and very few will see the relief, but let's just operate on the promise for a moment.
I'm outraged at the very thought of bailing out people who make stupid decisions. Interview after article after blog after email I read about how folks got into interest only loans to buy houses they couldn't afford in the first place, gambling that their job would improve, or that they could flip it and make real cash. Now entire subdivisions in Arizona, built right over some of my favorite dirt biking rabbit hunting areas, are like a ghost town - row after row of empty brand new homes. Sure, a few legitimate folks got caught in the downturn ... but I'm betting most were gambling for the get rich quick house flip. Personal debt has been skyrocketing for decades, and bankruptcies were climbing exponentially.
I guess I'm just an idiot. I've owned two houses in my life, stayed well below conservative on my level of mortgage, made my payments on time, and like all my other debts, proved myself to be a good risk. That's what I was told was the "right" thing to do. I don't own a house at present, and I wish I did ... if Uncle Sam moves me somewhere worth living, I'd gladly buy again. I'd gladly take over a foreclosure, and do my best to stimulate the economy. I've got the money, but my government isn't interested in helping me. I've got an amazing credit score, but that's not worth a thing to anybody. Instead, I'm the responsible citizen who's supposed to pony up and take care of everyone else. So yeah, sour grapes ... you could say I'm just angry I'm not getting any of that 1.5 billion.
Exactly how does rewarding someone for making a stupid gamble help them learn? What does it teach the rest of us that didn't gamble? Why are we protecting people from the consequences of their decisions again?