Author Topic: Problem?>  (Read 421 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline briarpatch

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2053
  • Gender: Male
Problem?>
« on: February 23, 2010, 04:33:57 PM »
February 23, 2010
Pentagon to Allow Women to Serve Aboard Navy Submarines

AP

The Pentagon will lift a decades-old policy that prohibits women from serving aboard Navy submarines.


   
WASHINGTON -- The Pentagon has moved to lift a decades-old policy that prohibits women from serving aboard Navy submarines, part of a gradual reconsideration of women's roles in a military fighting two wars whose front lines can be anywhere.

At issue is the end of a policy that kept women from serving aboard the last type of ship off-limits to them. The thinking was that the close quarters aboard subs would make coed service difficult to manage.

Defense Secretary Robert Gates notified Congress in a letter signed Friday that the Navy intends to repeal the ban on women sailors on subs. Congress has 30 days to weigh in.

"He supports the Navy's efforts to change their policy," Pentagon press secretary Geoff Morrell said Tuesday.

A defense official told The Associated Press that numerous physical changes to submarines would have to be made, but that cadets who graduate from the Naval Academy this year could be among the first Navy women to take submarine posts.

The change was first reported by ABC News.

The Navy's plan would phase in women's service, beginning with officers aboard the larger subs that are easier to retrofit for coed quarters. Women would never serve alone.

Because of the length of time required for training, it would be more than a year before the first women joined subs, assuming Congress raises no major objections that slow the schedule.

Women began serving aboard the Navy's surface ships in 1993.

Since then, many of the distinctions between who is combat and who is not have been erased.

Women are formally banned from combat posts in the Army, for instance, but routinely serve in jobs such as medics, pilots and drivers that place them shoulder to shoulder with men serving in "combat" jobs.

Army Chief of Staff Gen. George Casey told Congress on Tuesday that he supports a reconsideration of women's combat roles.

"I believe it's time that we take a look at what women are actually doing in Iraq and Afghanistan. And then we take a look at our policies," Casey told the Senate Armed Services Committee. While no organized effort is under way, "I think it's time," he added.


Offline LONGTOM

  • Trade Count: (391)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4644
  • Gender: Male
  • IF ONLY I COULD GO BACK-I WOULD BE A MOUNTAIN MAN!
Re: Problem?>
« Reply #1 on: February 24, 2010, 01:59:31 AM »
There will be a lot of rubbing in the passage ways, that's for sure.
Subs aren't but so wide!   ;)



LONGTOM
NRA Benefactor Life Member
NAHC Life Member
NRA Member-JAMES MADISON BRIGADE
IWLA Member
NRA/ILA Member
CCRKBA Member
US OLIMPIC SHOOTING TEAM supporter

"THE TREE OF LIBERTY FROM TIME TO TIME MUST BE REFRESHED WITH THE BLOOD OF PATRIOTS AND TYRANTS".
THOMAS JEFFERSON

That my two young sons may never have to know the horrors of war. 

I will stand for your rights as my forefathers did before me!
My thanks to those who have, are and will stand for mine!
To those in the military, I salute you!

LONGTOM 9-25-07

Offline Old Fart

  • Intergalactic Moderator
  • Moderator
  • Trade Count: (77)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3851
  • Gender: Male
Re: Problem?>
« Reply #2 on: February 24, 2010, 03:34:37 AM »
Plus there will probably be a price tag attached to this.
Accommodations and what nots.....
"All my life I've had a bad case of the Fred's. Fredrick Vanderbilt taste on a Fred Sanford budget." CR
Lifetime/Endowment/Patron NRA Member.
Second Amendment Foundation, www.saf.org - Life Member

Offline magooch

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6644
Re: Problem?>
« Reply #3 on: February 24, 2010, 03:42:38 AM »
Sure--why not?  I'm sure all the guys would get a kick out of being in the confines of a sub when the gals all get PMS at the same time--every month.
Swingem

Offline Brett

  • Trade Count: (6)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5148
  • Gender: Male
Re: Problem?>
« Reply #4 on: February 24, 2010, 05:08:18 AM »
Sure--why not?  I'm sure all the guys would get a kick out of being in the confines of a sub when the gals all get PMS at the same time--every month.

 "Damn the torpedoes!" :o :o :o
Life memberships:  <><, NRA, BASS, NAFC

Offline gypsyman

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4850
Re: Problem?>
« Reply #5 on: February 24, 2010, 07:42:50 AM »
Might not be a bad idea. Can you imagine how bad an attitude 6 or 8 women living aboard a sub, with all those guys,scratching themselves, fartin', snorin, tellen dirty jokes all the time. Probably worse than a team of Seals that didn't get a chance to blow something up!After a 6 month stint at sea, let'em loose on the detainee's on Gitmo. Probably confess to kidnapping the Lindburg baby just so somebody will shoot them. gypsyman
We keep trying peace, it usually doesn't work!!Remember(12/7/41)(9/11/01) gypsyman