Author Topic: Comments on accuracy!  (Read 1000 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline flintlock54

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 127
Comments on accuracy!
« on: November 11, 2003, 12:05:43 PM »
:D Test rifle: Knight Original Disc Magnum Blued 26" barrel

After spending three 8 hour days, hundreds of shots fired, numerous cleanings, and close to $250 worth of various projectiles, I can honestly say I know what works in my rifle. I used 100 grains of 777 pellets or 90-110 of loose 777 during my accuracy tests. CCI and Ferderal 209 primers.

The bottom line:

My goal was to find a method of loading that would be accurate with a swabed bore and a once/twice fired bore. No fouling shot in other words.

Most of the best known projectiles (with gold plated prices to match) were infact the most accurate. I will not mention them because they might get jealous. Matter of fact with 95 grains of loose powder and the CCI primers I shot some 1/4" groups at 100 yards but only after the bore was fouled after a few shots without cleaning.

The virdict:

100 grains of 777 pellets
Federal 209 primer
The ugliest, cheapest, green hornady sabots with .429 300 grain XTP

Snap a cap or two or fouling shot.
Swap bore with presoaked patches run both sides
Swap bore with dry T/C patch run both sides
Load

Repeat for each shot

This load procedure produced 1-1/4" groups @ 100 yards. Not the most accurate but the sabot and bullet fit was just right. The next shot with a fouled bore was only 1/2" higher at 50 yards. With most of the others the followup shot from a clean bore was as much as 4-6" higher. The fit is the key. The sabot was still tight with a clean bore but loose enough that a short starter was not needed with a fouled bore for the next few shots. Hope this helps some beginners. If a fouling shot is your bag I liked the Dead Centers and my favorite the packaged Nosler orange sabots with 300 grain bullet.

AMEN!

The scope was mounted using WARNE mounts and quick detach rings. Each time I pulled the breech plug for cleaning I removed the scope to check for repeated zero. Just make sure that you tighten the levers with equal pressure right at the point were they start to get snug.

I experienced "ZERO" problems, no pun intended.
<><

Offline savageT

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1594
Comments on accuracy!
« Reply #1 on: November 11, 2003, 02:16:52 PM »
Custom257,
Do I read your report correctly?  Did you have better accuracy/consistancy with 100 grains of 777 pellets versus 90-110 grains loose powder (2ff or 3fff)?  I've always felt that you will get better results with loose powder 777-2ff than using 2 or 3 -50 grain pellets.  Did your lower powder charges work better for accuracy and consistancy with the Dead Centers?

Jim
savageT........Have you hugged a '99 lately?

Of all the things I've lost in my life, I miss my mind the most.

Offline flintlock54

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 127
Comments on accuracy!
« Reply #2 on: November 11, 2003, 03:22:45 PM »
I did burn up over a pound and half of the loose 777 powder. Then I switched back to the pellets on the last day. The 220 grain Dead Centers shot the best with 95 grains of loose 777 but the bore had to be fouled, as recommeded by the manufacture. If you want a tack driver the Dead Cenetrs and the Noslers worked great with a fouled bore. The Hornady load also shot better with a fouled bore but the group did not open up as much going from clean to fouled. My rifle did not care for the powder belts although I have had success in other rifles.
<><