www.GBOReloaded.com
Home
Help
Articles
Classifieds
Login
Register
Graybeard Outdoors (GBO Reloaded)
»
Rifle and Optics Forums
»
Bolt Action Rifles
»
Ruger Hawkeye and 2003 77 MKII difference?
« previous
next »
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
Author
Topic: Ruger Hawkeye and 2003 77 MKII difference? (Read 608 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
coues2506
Trade Count:
(
0
)
Member
Posts: 85
Ruger Hawkeye and 2003 77 MKII difference?
«
on:
March 14, 2010, 11:24:25 AM »
What is the difference in these 2 rifles?
Logged
Coyote Hunter
Trade Count:
(
0
)
Senior Member
Posts: 2534
Re: Ruger Hawkeye and 2003 77 MKII difference?
«
Reply #1 on:
March 14, 2010, 02:11:07 PM »
The MKII has the older, non-adjustable trigger, the Hawkey has the newer and "improved" LC6 trigger. The Hawkeye also has a slimmer, lighter stock.
Don't know what other differences might exist. They are both fine rifles.
Logged
Coyote Hunter
NRA, GOA, DAD - and I VOTE!
Hank08
Trade Count:
(
35
)
A Real Regular
Posts: 887
Re: Ruger Hawkeye and 2003 77 MKII difference?
«
Reply #2 on:
March 17, 2010, 05:32:15 AM »
The Mk2 had two different stocks, the 2nd one without the cutout was a better design than the Hawkeye stock, at least I like it better. A good trigger man can make either trigger to your satisfaction.
H08
Logged
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up
« previous
next »
Graybeard Outdoors (GBO Reloaded)
»
Rifle and Optics Forums
»
Bolt Action Rifles
»
Ruger Hawkeye and 2003 77 MKII difference?