okay... so help an ignorant old fool out here...
the single stage and two stage trigger accomplish the same thing. actuate the firing mechanism. they both require 2lb pull to accomplish this. the first stage of the two stage trigger allows the shooter to pre-load the trigger to whatever weight it is set and then break the trigger with the remainiing required weight. to accomplish this, typically, a two stage trigger has a more complex mechanism, more levers, and so is slower to release the firing pin. slower lock time. because of the 2lb requirement, pre-loading the single stage trigger is relatively easy. it isn't going to go off when you touch it. a well designed single stage trigger usually has a single lever and a faster lock time.
so are we saying that we are willing to sacrifice a bit of lock time because we are not able to consistently, effectively, pre-load a single stage trigger?
do we think that a two stage trigger is going to save us if we don't have well founded and practiced trigger technique? HAS THE WHOLE WORLD GONE MAD!!!!! ARE DOGS AND CATS NOW LIVING TOGETHER!?!?!?!?!?!?
for those of you who think i am just asking these questions because i shoot a finnfire and there is no two stage trigger available for it... i got one thing to say to you. bite me. YOU ARE ABSOLUTELY RIGHT, but bite me anyway.
happy holidays folks. be safe.
dave