Digital Photo Experts...your opinion

[TM7]

.
Here is a photo of 911 tower impact:






Red arrows:  Left aileron gone. (the small wing in the tail)

Wing between the left engine and left side fuselage gone. Replaced by building front CGI.

Plane seems to 'melt' into building facade.

Gee,,,is this just digital smudge, or should we point this out to the Obama administration?


What say you...?


...TM7
.

 

[briarpatch]

I can give an explanation for what we see but I cant prove it. That is why so much gets sweeped under the rug.
A lawyer would say that the small rear stabilizer (left side) broke off from the impact, was driven forward and is now along side the plane out of view. The same could be said for the section of missing wing.
The fuselage shows the plane embedded in the building past the wing. As the wing was sectioned on impact the piece from the base of fuselage to the wing engine is now out of sight either driven into the fuselage or out of sight beside the body of the plane. The wings are swept and the first part to hit would be the base were attached to the body. This could also account for the reason the outer part of the wing and engine have not engaged the building yet.