Author Topic: Why shoot only lead in sabots?  (Read 564 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline wreckhog

  • Trade Count: (55)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2997
Why shoot only lead in sabots?
« on: May 08, 2010, 06:12:13 AM »
Seems like a .45 wadcutter of iron rod would have a nice meplat in a .50 sabot. No deformation of bullet tips. No concern about expansion. No health related lead concerns. No pollution related lead concerns. Biodegradeable. Can't be any worse ballistically than round balls. Can't use a bullet puller, but with CO2, you can eject the bullet. Might be some corrosion issues. Not that I have the resources to cut/turn these. But iron is cheap enough if you can fabricate it.

Do anyone do this?

Offline PA-Joe

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 980
Re: Why shoot only lead in sabots?
« Reply #1 on: May 08, 2010, 06:24:14 AM »
Iron does not haqve the density of lead. Read about the waterfowl hunting issues with steel shot. You don't have to use pure lead in a sabot. You can use XTP's or any other bullet.

Offline Semisane

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 569
Re: Why shoot only lead in sabots?
« Reply #2 on: May 08, 2010, 06:42:35 AM »
That would be interesting wreckhog.  I've never heard of anyone trying.  A 300 grain .452 bullet like the XTP or Gold Dot is a little over 0.9" long.  I wonder how much a billet of iron .452 X 0.95 would weigh?
CLICK ON ME: .
Link to... highchairstands@cox.net

Offline wreckhog

  • Trade Count: (55)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2997
Re: Why shoot only lead in sabots?
« Reply #3 on: May 08, 2010, 07:13:33 AM »
Steel is about 70% of lead density. Steel vs iron about the same? A wadcutter would be heavier than a hollowpoint. Wildass guessing around 240-250 grains? Copper is about the same density as steel.