Author Topic: Barnes Bullets; no longer "those wierd bullets"?  (Read 416 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline john keyes

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 770
Barnes Bullets; no longer "those wierd bullets"?
« on: May 18, 2010, 01:30:19 PM »
I keep reading a whole lot here about folks using Barnes bullets and really liking them. Looks like they have become real popular and shockingly broken into the realm of (gasp) NORMAL BULLETS    ;D
Since I live mostly in my own little extremely biased world I haven't  kept up with them. Whenever I see the word Barnes I instinctively and subconsiously lump them into the "those weird bullets" category. I still (most likely mistakenly) think they are  made up of pure copper that opens up into an X.  I'm probably only about 15 years behind.   :o
Looks like I have branded them with  an irreversible stigma.
Maybe I need to give them a chance by opening  my mind and my pocketbook up and buy some so I can break the stigma.
Funny how we get an idea early on, make a decision and cling to it for dear life.  sorry, I'm rambling. 
there used to be another brand like Barnes but I can't recall it right now....
I'm pretty sure I owe anyone who read this gibberish 3 min of their life back   ;D
Though taken from established manufacturers' sources and presumed to be safe please do not use any load that I have posted. Please reference Hogdon, Lyman, Speer and others as a source of data for your own use.

Offline southernutah

  • Trade Count: (25)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 560
Re: Barnes Bullets; no longer "those wierd bullets"?
« Reply #1 on: May 18, 2010, 05:48:28 PM »
Hornady now has one.
BTW Barnes got bought out by Remington a while back.

Offline necchi

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (40)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1842
  • Gender: Male
Re: Barnes Bullets; no longer "those wierd bullets"?
« Reply #2 on: May 18, 2010, 06:26:38 PM »
Funny how we get an idea early on, make a decision and cling to it for dear life.

So True, so true my friend.  ;)

 I'm not going to use them, other bullets work just fine for those of us with experiance.

 I am going to load them for my son, he's 17 and only has 4 years experiance with Deer hunting, he's a good shooter, but last season he made a 300 yrd shot (edge of a wheat field) with a Nosler Ballistic tip, (Winchester factory ammo recomended for big game), and the bullet exploded with little penetration. The second shot too the neck did the same but did the job. He hunts with the ex's side grandpa, he's good enough to bring his grandson up too the family land, but he's not that much of a hunting nut.
 The first shoulder shot should have done it, part of it is my fault, I didn't prep him for that kind of shot and I didn't provide a good enough bullet for that distance. The Barnes is supposed to penetrate and cause damage, 95% of the reviews say they do. And I got them to fly right out of his gun, alot better than the Partition, sooo,,
 Spendy? Yes. Do they look wierd? Well, Yes they do. But you'll hafta wait till November for me to tell ya if they do the job or not.  ;D

 By the way, they are still copper, and they do open into an X. The big deal is all about the Califorication Lead-Free zones, with these and other copper bullets, guy's can still hunt. It's wonderfull news that they work well, the anti's back-door assault on hunting with a lead ban has met a match.
found elsewhere

Offline Dand

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (35)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2974
Re: Barnes Bullets; no longer "those wierd bullets"?
« Reply #3 on: May 18, 2010, 10:58:31 PM »
In addition to the Barnes, and Hornady, Nosler makes their E Tip all copper alloy bullet. I have some but haven't loaded or shot them.
NRA Life

liberal Justice Hugo Black said, and I quote: "There are 'absolutes' in our Bill of Rights, and they were put there on purpose by men who knew what words meant and meant their prohibitions to be 'absolutes.'" End quote. From a recent article by Wayne LaPierre NRA

Offline Grumulkin

  • Trade Count: (33)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2028
    • http://www.orchardphoto.com
Re: Barnes Bullets; no longer "those wierd bullets"?
« Reply #4 on: May 19, 2010, 12:45:54 AM »
I haven't branded Barnes bullets with "in irreversible stigma" but don't think they're any better than other bullets that are just as accurate and cheaper unless you wish to take a large animal with a marginal weapon.  Of course, if you're unfortunate enough to live in a state with a ban on lead containing bullets for hunting, then Barnes would be as good a choice as Hornady and Nosler.

Offline wncchester

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3856
  • Gender: Male
Re: Barnes Bullets; no longer "those wierd bullets"?
« Reply #5 on: May 19, 2010, 02:45:18 AM »
"Funny how we get an idea early on, make a decision and cling to it for dear life.  sorry, I'm rambling."

Yep.  Bullets.   Powders.   Primers.   Lee.   Leupold.   Remington.   Hunting.   Chevy.    California.   Democrats.    9mm.    All listed in no particular order. 

Once our minds are made up for or against something it's hard to make us consider any error or alternatives, it's sorta like, "Don't need to, I already know all I want to know."  It's hard to learn much if we stay in our comfort zone forever.
Common sense is an uncommon virtue