Author Topic: In Re: Nordyke v. King  (Read 219 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline subdjoe

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3036
  • Gender: Male
In Re: Nordyke v. King
« on: July 12, 2010, 05:58:36 PM »
Quote
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
RUSSELL ALLEN NORDYKE; ANN ü
SALLIE NORDYKE, dba TS Trade
Shows; JESS B. GUY; DUANE DARR;
WILLIAM J. JONES; DARYL N.
DAVID; TASIANA WESTYSCHYN; JEAN
LEE; TODD BALTES; DENNIS BLAIR,
R.L. ADAMS; ROGER BAKER; MIKE No. 07-15763
FOURNIER; VIRGIL MCVICKER, ý D.C. No. Plaintiffs-Appellants, CV-99-04389-MJJ
v. ORDER
MARY V. KING; GAIL STEELE;
WILMA CHAN; KEITH CARSON;
SCOTT HAGGERTY; COUNTY OF
ALAMEDA; COUNTY OF ALAMEDA
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS,
Defendants-Appellees. þ
Filed July 12, 2010
Before: Alex Kozinski, Chief Judge, Harry Pregerson,
Stephen Reinhardt, Diarmuid F. O’Scannlain,
Pamela Ann Rymer, Michael Daly Hawkins,
Susan P. Graber, Ronald M. Gould, Richard C. Tallman,
Milan D. Smith, Jr. and Sandra S. Ikuta, Circuit Judges.
ORDER


The panel opinion in Nordyke v. King, 563 F.3d 439 (9th
Cir. 2009), is vacated and the case is remanded to that panel
for further consideration in light of McDonald v. City of Chicago,
No. 08-1521, slip op. (U.S. June 28, 2010).
9907

So the panty wetting anti-civil rights judge tucked what little tail he has between his legs and called off his witch hunt. 

Now, maybe the original panel will decide that a county fair grounds doesn't fall within the scope of "sensitive area" per Heller & McDonald.
Your ob't & etc,
Joseph Lovell

Justice Robert H. Jackson - It is not the function of the government to keep the citizen from falling into error; it is the function of the citizen to keep the government from falling into error.