yt3, I would most certainly like to see peace in the middle east, as would most. History dictates it is futile with the present players. Ancient men, modern men and books written long ago, bear this out.
Peace is desired by you and I from a distance but not from those involved. If peace were a viable option, it would have been instituted way before now by those involved.
To think a man, that neither side respects, can demand from either side a concession of arms, land, heritage, families or the very essence of who they are, to obtain peace, is sheer folly. (you would not allow it in your home neither will they)
Only the drum beat of war and the accomplished desire of removeing the other from their presents will satisfy the demands of injustice both sides feel. (an injustice derived by taken land from one and given to the other in 1948, (again by a people (foreign body) neither respected.)
What we have now is men seeking advantage over each other on the world stage.
This we have seen for the past 60 years with Isarel as a gathered people. Prior to that Isarel was seen for thousands of years as a scattered remnant of people.
The clown (o), (because I have seen his ways and know his communist intentions), seeks a stage to gain some credibility because he has lost most and the Jews and Palestinians needing weapons of war to remove each other (paid for by American taxpayers) along with a stage to ellicit sympathy for their cause, understands they too, must play the game.
By falsely seeking peace in the middle east, all three may find what they seek.
Every president/puppet that has been in trouble has done this. Nothing new here.
As the old African saying goes: when elephants fight, only the grass gets trampled.
