Brett siad:
......My guess is that a double stack rimfire magazine is more difficult to manufacture requiring tighter tolerances in order to work reliably and be more difficult to keep working reliably since rimfire ammo is generally not the cleanest burning stuff.
Besides how much of a market is their really for rimfire pistols carrying more than 10 rounds? Extra loaded 10 round magazines are inexpensive enough, small and lite enough that you can carry several on you without any hardship. Replacing a spent magazine with a full one takes but a couple of seconds, not a big issue with a non defensive gun which is what most of us consider a .22lr anyway. Finally, probably 90% or better of rimfire gun stoppages are caused by a magazine related issue such as dirt or bent feed lips so that a quick change of magazines will get you up and running ASAP.
Personally I would rather have a 10 rounder in the gun with two spares in a pocket or belt scabbard than one 30 rounder in the gun.
Another thought I have is how is the balance of the pistol effected as you go from a full 30 round magazine down to the last half dozen rounds?......
I would say: If a 30 round magazine can be made and it works; they why not making a 30 round 22LR? I would say to the mechanically inclined tinkers to try it. It should be easy to use the PMR-30 platform by just changing a barrel and magazine (conversion kit 22WMR to 22LR).
As far as market for a high capacity 22LR pistol, I would ask: How much of a market is there for a 22 WMR with 30 round magazine is out there? I would say, Kel-tec can keep up with production and there is a track load of customers (including me) that wants one.
Personally I would rather have a 30 rounder in the gun with two 30 rounders spares in the pocket.
The balance will have the same effect as a Glock 17 as you empty its magazine. That is just my opinion even though I also like the 10 rounders too.
Camba