Author Topic: Rem. 788  (Read 2877 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline commando74

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 15
Rem. 788
« on: December 11, 2009, 11:36:45 AM »
I'm in the market for a 30-30 rifle for my wife. She is tall and has long arms and she doesn't feel comfortable with a 336. Today in a shop I saw the silhouette of a 788 on the consignment rack. I had one of these many years ago in 222 and it was way too accurate for such a cheap rifle. This one has had the action and barrel bedded and a trigger job done to it. The barrel looked pristine and the mag. was in good condition. The price was $499.00 listed is this way too much? I think that it would be perfect and it will probably shoot cast slugs mostly if it were in our gun rack.

Offline mrbigtexan

  • Trade Count: (7)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 594
Re: Rem. 788
« Reply #1 on: December 11, 2009, 02:17:20 PM »
30-30s usually fetch this price. probably a good buy.

Offline Tonk

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 373
Re: Rem. 788
« Reply #2 on: December 16, 2009, 12:08:28 PM »
Commando74, in my humble opinion $500 dollars is way to much for a Remington model 788 in a 30-30 or any other caliber in a 788 Remmy. The only good thing is that you don't need to worry about the barrel being shot out ok. I saw a new Marlin sell for $335 dollars yesterday with a warranty etc. Do you know how old that rifle actualy is in age? I had my first one in a 22-250 back in the 1960's!

If your looking for a good quality rifle for the wife, check out those new Savage rifles or the CZ's for that matter. I just purchased one of each and they are both tack drivers, Savage has that Accutrigger which is fully adjustable and the CZ has the double set trigger. Good Luck finding that rifle for the wife! ;)  :)

Offline mannyrock

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2081
Re: Rem. 788
« Reply #3 on: December 16, 2009, 12:37:40 PM »

  I generally see the 788s in .30-30 go for between $500 and $700, depending on condition.  They are a great rifle, but are fairly heavy.  Your wife may prefer a lighter rifle. 

Offline MGMorden

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2093
  • Gender: Male
Re: Rem. 788
« Reply #4 on: December 17, 2009, 02:05:46 AM »
That sounds like about the going rate, but if you're looking for something cheaper you might look at the Savage 340's. Another bolt action .30-30.  I find their stock a little more comfortable than my Marlin 336 but if you wanted the complete Monte Carlo setup Richards will cut stocks for the 336.  You could get a utility grade stock for under $100.  Give that the Savage 340's tend to sell for more in the $100-200 range on the used racks, you still might come out well ahead of the Rem 788.

Offline mannyrock

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2081
Re: Rem. 788
« Reply #5 on: December 17, 2009, 06:19:31 AM »

  And .30-30 magazines for the 788 are really hard to find. I have seen them priced at $80 or more!

   Again, a 788 in .30-30 would seem to be an odd rifle for a woman, at least as her starting rifle.   A Stevens 200, in .243, would be far far cheaper, and just as accurate, and lighter, and perhaps better suited.

Offline Siskiyou

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3417
  • Gender: Male
Re: Rem. 788
« Reply #6 on: December 17, 2009, 07:59:58 AM »
The Remington 788 is an okay rifle.  I bought mine new thirty years ago.  It does not come close to being a pretty rifle.  It is very accurate, but I wish I would have purchased a Remington 700, or a Savage.  As a cheap rifle it was a great bargain.   At $499 it is not a cheap rifle.  The only person it is worth $499 to is the one selling it.

It is not a great carry rifle with the protruding magazine.  Unlike the rounded corners on my Remington 760 magazine the 788 magazine is square cut with pointed corners.   The bluing has been a 788 issue, and can be a problem if you hunt in wet weather or do not take proper precaution when storing.

My 788 feels heavy but that is not a factor because I use mine as a varmint rifle. 

If one of my granddaughters decides she needs a deer rifle, I will gladly pass it to her.  In .243 Winchester it is a pleasant rifle to shoot.

If my brother or a buddy want to have a little shooting contest I would reach for my M788, it is hard to beat accuracy.
There is a learning process to effectively using a gps.  Do not throw your compass and map away!

Boycott: San Francisco, L.A., Oakland, and City of Sacramento, CA.

Offline hunt-m-up

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (27)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1122
  • Gender: Male
Re: Rem. 788
« Reply #7 on: December 17, 2009, 09:36:40 AM »
The 788's are great guns, I had a 6mm that I wish I would have kept. That price seems like the going rate, but for that price you can buy a lot newer guns that will be lighter and at least as accurate. While they are a little heavy, I'm partial to the Weatherby Vangaurd youth or carbine in 243, 7-08, or 308.
Crosman Slingshot, Daisy Red Ryder, dull butter knife

Offline wreckhog

  • Trade Count: (55)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2997
Re: Rem. 788
« Reply #8 on: December 17, 2009, 10:12:16 AM »
Local shop had a 788 in .243 a month. Sold for $350 the same day it was traded in. See a nicer one in 6mm sit for a month or 2 at $500. Price sounds in the ballpark. 340's ain't $100 anymore, maybe not for 10 years.

Offline commando74

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 15
Re: Rem. 788
« Reply #9 on: December 17, 2009, 11:45:50 AM »
I bought the rifle a few days ago. The reason I bought it is because I have a whole bunch of 30-30 brass. I have owned a 788 in 222 a long time ago and am familiar with both their drawbacks and their pluses. I reloaded some ammo today for it but I'm waiting for a scope and rings. We live in a small town right now and plan to be living out in the country ( in northern Minn. that means the woods ) next year at this time. She doesn't care about hunting with it she wants a rifle she can use for shooting anything she doesn't like in her space, she also has and shoots regularly a trooper MK III a ruger MK I and an SP 101 dao, She has also shot my US 1917 now thats heavy, this gun will probably see mostly cast slugs with the occasional jacketed soft point, we're both looking forward to shooting it. 

Offline mannyrock

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2081
Re: Rem. 788
« Reply #10 on: December 18, 2009, 05:26:12 AM »

Commando,

  You've stated very good reasons for your choice. In the end, if SHE likes the rifle, then that's all that matters.

  If she finds that the 788 is too heavy, then I wouldn't automatically jump over to a lever action .30-30.  Most of them have very straight stocks, that will kick the heck out of the chin of a smaller person when a scope is mounted.

Mannyrock

Offline MGMorden

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2093
  • Gender: Male
Re: Rem. 788
« Reply #11 on: December 18, 2009, 06:54:38 AM »
340's ain't $100 anymore, maybe not for 10 years.

I bought mine less than 2 years ago for $99 ;).

I've seen one since then for $115.

Offline poncaguy

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2751
  • Gender: Male
Re: Rem. 788
« Reply #12 on: December 22, 2009, 04:09:10 PM »
Great rifles , but heavy. Buy a Marlin, very accurate, outstanding trigger, and light. I now have 3, 270, 25-06, and 7-08. Want a 308 next!

Offline jeepmann1948

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (67)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1422
  • Gender: Male
  • San Angelo, Texas
Re: Rem. 788
« Reply #13 on: December 25, 2009, 01:51:14 PM »
I changed the stock out on a 778 (22-250) for a Ramline Synthetic . to get rid of the clunk, I removed the pad and filled the cavity with closed cell foam. It shot very well before I changed the stock,but with the new one it was awesome a 89.00 (new price in the 60's) just isn't supposed to shoot sub quarter inch groups but this one does. Someday I hope my nephew-in law returns it  ;D
 Ok after a long dissertation .If you want a 788 Rem to go on a diet, change the stock.
"it ain't what you shoot em with......................
  it's where you hit em "

Offline huntswithdogs

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 999
Re: Rem. 788
« Reply #14 on: December 31, 2009, 09:50:23 AM »
Jeep,

Did ya have to do much cutting or grinding for the clip and stuff to work right? I had a Ramline stock a good while back that needed all kinds of grinding to get it to fit right and have shied away from them since. I'd be interested in doing this with my 788 (308) if it doesn't/ wouldn't turn into a winter project.

Thanks,
HWD

Offline luv2shoot

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 105
Re: Rem. 788
« Reply #15 on: January 05, 2010, 01:59:22 PM »
i've got a carbine .308 in a ram line just dropped in, no grinding or fitting
If it Feels Good, Shoot it Again!!!!

Offline kiddekop

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 280
Re: Rem. 788
« Reply #16 on: January 17, 2010, 10:16:21 AM »
The Remington 788 is an okay rifle.  I bought mine new thirty years ago.  It does not come close to being a pretty rifle.  It is very accurate, but I wish I would have purchased a Remington 700, or a Savage.  As a cheap rifle it was a great bargain.   At $499 it is not a cheap rifle.  The only person it is worth $499 to is the one selling it.

It is not a great carry rifle with the protruding magazine.  Unlike the rounded corners on my Remington 760 magazine the 788 magazine is square cut with pointed corners.   The bluing has been a 788 issue, and can be a problem if you hunt in wet weather or do not take proper precaution when storing.

My 788 feels heavy but that is not a factor because I use mine as a varmint rifle. 

If one of my granddaughters decides she needs a deer rifle, I will gladly pass it to her.  In .243 Winchester it is a pleasant rifle to shoot.

If my brother or a buddy want to have a little shooting contest I would reach for my M788, it is hard to beat accuracy.

We never had any rust problems because our gs taught us well to clean all traces of oil from the blued surface and coat our rifles and shotguns with TREWAX and the company knows it's famous for use on weapons!

Offline JW/OK

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (31)
  • Avid Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 185
  • Gender: Male
Re: Rem. 788
« Reply #17 on: January 23, 2010, 06:43:05 AM »
Commando,
I think you will like the 788 in 30/30. I picked up one in Tulsa last summer at a gunshow, I intend to hand it down to my grandson someday. I tried my 30/30 Contender pistol load in it and it really worked out good. It is a 125 grain Nosler BT with H4198 powder. I took it to South Dakota and used it on an antelope doe at a lazered 136 yards broadside shot and was a bang flop with exit wound. Would rather have a heavier bullet for heavier deer but for antelope and small deer its a good choice with no recoil and MOA accuracy.
My safety didn't work properly but a good cleaning fixed the problem.
JW

Offline releehweoj

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 37
Re: Rem. 788
« Reply #18 on: October 19, 2010, 08:22:19 AM »
Took my first deer in 1975 with a borrowed LH Rem M788 in .308.  My boss, the gun's owner, took me hunting for the first time and I nailed a nice 8 point at ~125 yards.  After that, my father bought me a Win Mod 770 in .308 and I've been shooting that caliber for 35 years.  Remembered that the M788 was LH when my LH son was ready for a step up from his .243.  Looked for a year and couldn't find one.  Taught him to shoot RH...

Offline Siskiyou

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3417
  • Gender: Male
Re: Rem. 788
« Reply #19 on: October 19, 2010, 03:18:23 PM »
I must back off my earlier recommendation of the Remington 788 based on extensive testing of “My 788” the last few months.  Judgment of the series cannot be made based on one rifle with two magazines.  The rifle will continue in the line-up as a limited varmint rifle because of the caliber it is chambered in and its accuracy.  If I am hunting deer or bear I want a dependable rifle in my hands.  “My 788” is not dependable at this time.  I have a lot of components for it and is will do as a practice rifle.

I was pleased with my different handloads during the summer.  I have 40 rounds reserved for deer and bear hunting.  The 105-grain Speer Splitzer pushed by WMR (Winchester Magnum Rifle) powder in new Winchester cases.  I fired this load along with others at 100 and 200 yards.  Without a doubt the rifle is accurate in the hands of an old shaky shooter.  This is at 100 yards and should be adequate for the targeted game.


http://www.gboreloaded.com/forums/index.php/topic,213380.msg1099170677.html#msg1099170677

You mentioned you were looking at a 30-30 for your wife. 

I believe there are a lot of used 30-30 rifles on the used gun racks that are better made then the Remington 788.  One of the rifles I took to the range as a companion to the 788 this summer was a Marlin 336 made in 1971.  It was bought new as a K-Mart special on sale for $79.  I paid more for the 788 on sale a few years later.

The workings of the Marlin 336 was flawless, the action is very smooth and dependable.  The top four rounds are Hornady factory 160-grain Leverelution rounds aimed at the center orange spot.  The lower group was aimed at the low spot, using the second cross hair in the BDC scope.  I expected the point of impact to be different with the 150-grain Hornady RN bullet.  This is acceptable 30-30 accuracy for my hunting needs.

Unlike the 788 the Marlin 336 had absolute no issues at the range.  It is the rifle I would bet a deer or bear tag on.

The shorter stock of the Marlin 336 comes in handy when heavier fall, winter, and spring clothing is worn.  The addition of a recoil pad without cutting back the stock can also take care of the length of pull issue.  During a hunt my length of pull will change with the evening and morning hours favoring additional clothing, and shading during the heat of the day.  I do have a slip-on pad for my Marlin but rarely use it because of the cooler fall weather. 



The high flyer was the first round and I made an adjustment to bring the point of impact down at 100 yards.

I will not let my granddaughters use the 788 for hunting because safety demands a reliable rifle.  I will work towards improving the magazine feed.  Otherwise it is a good rifle for an experience shooter.  They lack experience dealing with a problem firearm at this time.    My wife has not hunted for many years but if she expressed an interest I would not burden her with this rifle.

During my career I attended quarterly firearms qualifications and training.   A malfunctioning firearm would never be certified for duty.  I recall. A case of non-original manufacture handgun magazines being disposed of because they did not make the grade.

My fall hunting trip has gone down the toilet with a case of shingles.  A day or two before the outbreak I was packing for the trip.  I packed ammunition for two different rifles, niether of them being the M788. 
There is a learning process to effectively using a gps.  Do not throw your compass and map away!

Boycott: San Francisco, L.A., Oakland, and City of Sacramento, CA.

Offline R.W.Dale

  • Trade Count: (22)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2170
Re: Rem. 788
« Reply #20 on: October 20, 2010, 03:14:45 AM »
I've owned every bolt action 30/30 made and had long fantacized about the 788 in this cartridge. This desire was only fueled when I had to sight in dads butter covered smooth 243 788

Fast forward a few months and I gunbrokered up a like new 30/30 788 for $520

Unfortunately the instant I picked up the rifle I was sorely disappointed. Un beknownst to me at the time it turned out that the rimmed 788's used a completely different bolt that shared none of the buttery smoothness of the 308 based guns. My Chinese copy of a hi Lift jack in my jeep is smoother to operate.

Top all this off with a dose of not better than levergun accuracy and a laughably short magazine length had me keeping this turkey around for only a couple weeks.

Offline Coyote Hunter

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2534
Re: Rem. 788
« Reply #21 on: October 23, 2010, 08:56:46 AM »
$499 is more than I would pay for a 788 in .30-06 or any other cartridge.

Nor sure why your wife wants a .30-30 but if recoil and terminal effectiveness are the reasons, there are plenty of other options.  

A lightweight Roberts is an excellent choice and will handle everything from prairie dogs to elk with little more recoil than the .30-30.  A .260 Rem or 7mm-08 are other good choices.

If length of pull is the reason, try adding a slip-on recoil pad to a Marlin 336.  Bought my 336CS in very good condition for $225.
  
Coyote Hunter
NRA, GOA, DAD - and I VOTE!

Offline Harry Snippe

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 641
  • Gender: Male
Re: Rem. 788
« Reply #22 on: October 28, 2010, 04:53:57 PM »
The 788 is noted for the safety catching and then going to fire condition . Also this trigger thing with  guns going off . They did shoot like a house on fire .
So walking - keep that chamber empty
Happy