Author Topic: 300 Ruger Compact Mag  (Read 924 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Happy

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 156
300 Ruger Compact Mag
« on: October 03, 2010, 08:12:39 PM »
Any one shooting the ruger compact mag ?
The short barrel and loads comparable to the 300/338 WM 's appeal to me .

I have a winchester 70 in 300 WM and think the shorter barrel would be a plus, since most shots would be 200 yards or less.With the gun's 26" barrel in heavy cover you think your trying to turn arround with a broom stick in your hand

I would like to know a bit more about the gun as well as the cartridge Are they worth it, or should I stay with a 23" WSM ?
If any one has experiance with this rifles it would be of benifit  
Thanks
Happy

Offline Harry Snippe

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 641
  • Gender: Male
Re: 300 Ruger Compact Mag
« Reply #1 on: October 27, 2010, 05:29:53 PM »
Guess the rifle is doomed as was the Remington short Mag series .
Apparently there is no interst in the calipier .
Happy

Offline Lloyd Smale

  • Moderators
  • Trade Count: (32)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18263
Re: 300 Ruger Compact Mag
« Reply #2 on: October 28, 2010, 01:46:05 AM »
I guess my take on it is this. I like the 300 win and wby mags but my use for them is long range deer shooting. If I know that my shots will be under 250 yards i usually take a differnt gun. So the long 24 and even 26 inch barrels in the mags dont get in my way and help ballistics. Personaly i dont hunt a senerio where i would need a 20 inch 300 mag. At those ranges a 308 or 06 will do anything i ask of it and do it with less fuss. that been said i wouldnt mind one in 338 though for thumping bigger animals in the brush. Thats just me though and everyone hunts differnt and has differnt needs in a gun.
blue lives matter

Offline nomosendero

  • Trade Count: (6)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5760
  • Gender: Male
Re: 300 Ruger Compact Mag
« Reply #3 on: October 28, 2010, 06:03:30 PM »
I guess my take on it is this. I like the 300 win and wby mags but my use for them is long range deer shooting. If I know that my shots will be under 250 yards i usually take a differnt gun. So the long 24 and even 26 inch barrels in the mags dont get in my way and help ballistics. Personaly i dont hunt a senerio where i would need a 20 inch 300 mag. At those ranges a 308 or 06 will do anything i ask of it and do it with less fuss. that been said i wouldnt mind one in 338 though for thumping bigger animals in the brush. Thats just me though and everyone hunts differnt and has differnt needs in a gun.

+1
You will not make peace with the Bluecoats, you are free to go.

Offline Harry Snippe

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 641
  • Gender: Male
Re: 300 Ruger Compact Mag
« Reply #4 on: October 30, 2010, 08:08:37 AM »
I guess my take on it is this. I like the 300 win and wby mags but my use for them is long range deer shooting. If I know that my shots will be under 250 yards i usually take a differnt gun. So the long 24 and even 26 inch barrels in the mags dont get in my way and help ballistics. Personaly i dont hunt a senerio where i would need a 20 inch 300 mag. At those ranges a 308 or 06 will do anything i ask of it and do it with less fuss. that been said i wouldnt mind one in 338 though for thumping bigger animals in the brush. Thats just me though and everyone hunts differnt and has differnt needs in a gun.
Lloyd
You think a 338 might be a good thing in heavy cover . Well I agree . you loose a few hundred FPS , but have the advantage of still over the power of a '06 .You don't need a 300o FPS , but a bigger rock into Papa Moose might be one he doesn't have a cork for .
I have an o6 with an 18 1/5 " barrel too .Maybe that should have been a whelen!!
Happy

Offline BBF

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10042
  • Gender: Male
  • I feel much better now knowing it will get worse.
Re: 300 Ruger Compact Mag
« Reply #5 on: October 30, 2010, 08:06:31 PM »

.................. but a bigger rock into Papa Moose might be one he doesn't have a cork for .
I have an o6 with an 18 1/5 " barrel too .Maybe that should have been a whelen!!

  or a 358 Win would be good as well.
What is the point of Life if you can't have fun.

Offline Harry Snippe

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 641
  • Gender: Male
Re: 300 Ruger Compact Mag
« Reply #6 on: November 01, 2010, 06:50:17 PM »
Scatterbrain
I had a 358 BLR . The gun gave me nothing but grief so I sold it . this was a year before Ruger once again brought out the bolt 358 W , otherwise I would have bought one .
By chance trade ,I did acquire a T3 in 338 F and have grown to like it . took two deer with it last year .

But it is no 300 WM.
Now if the RCM was going to be the step up , I would consider it , I have two  '06 and the 338 F so that is what gets used . The 300 goes where the country is more open like a watch At a Hydro cut  or where there is a wood cut and shots could be long .
Happy

Offline BBF

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10042
  • Gender: Male
  • I feel much better now knowing it will get worse.
Re: 300 Ruger Compact Mag
« Reply #7 on: November 01, 2010, 06:57:52 PM »
Harry:
 I had a beautiful looking and shooting Browing Lever in 358 Win and let a friend talk me out of it.  That is many years ago he still has it and uses it for everything he hunts in BC.
It is a mid range cartridge. I was looking at the Ruger and decided the price was too rich for me and got that used Husky instead that is costing me more then the Ruger would have. >:(
What is the point of Life if you can't have fun.