Mueller has a good following and what I understand a good warranty, but I don't think that it will hold up to the recoil over time that the 22-250 can generate, compared to what most people are putting this scope on which is a 17HMR or 22LR.I could be wrong, but this is my thought. Mueller is still new on the scope scene, and haven't proven themself like other top named scope manufacturer's have. Even though Redfield(not endorsing) which is a new/old scope company, they're using Leupold's knowledge/glass/parts/and probably some employees, to bring out a scope that is just as good as their "parent" company, but at a better price. How long have you been comparing scopes and what is your price range? I own Weaver(V-classic), Nikon(Buckmaster), Burris(FullfieldII), BSA(Contender), Bushnell(Banner), Simmons(44 MAG) and have owned Tasco and other cheaper scopes, so I have a broad spectrum of choices to answer questions of Pro/Con of each scope with, and each scope has something different on the rifle I have the scope mounted on. My rifles are from a 17HMR up to a 30-06.
Del
Del