Good evening, new guy here from Ontario- I've been lurking for a few years and always enjoyed reading the intelligent posts.
I am a well rounded shooter/reloader with 25+ years of experience and am about to purchase a new NEF Handi rifle. The question comes down to caliber in this instance- .223 Rem vs .204 Ruger.
I really couldn't care less about terminal ballistics between the two because lets face it- at 3000+ fps I'm sure the Coyotes/Paper targets won't care either. My interest is inherent accuracy of the Handi Rifle.
Specifically I have been reading about a long leade/throat on the .223 Handi. Plenty of internet folk claim sub-MOA with handloads while some get 3" patterns. I'd be happy with a repeatable MOA.
I didn't read anything about the .204 Ruger having a long throat...
Right now I'm already set up with dies/components for .223 Rem, and ideally would like to buy the rifle in this caliber- makes sense right? However I would like to have the bullet seated just shy of the lands. Are current models still subject to the excessive throat length or did that clear up with the switch to 1:9 twist barrel?
So based on your collective experience can you who know best please chime in on which rifle should be inherently more accurate based on these two calibers throating.
Obviously its not a benchrest gun- I get that, but I'd like to be off to a good start too.. Thank you all, in advance.