A few questions for devout evolutionists..

[SHOOTALL]

and science books were never to be the blue print of a religion 

[XD40SC]

Some of you are stuck in the old- how does a monkey turn into a man- way of thinking. As I said earlier , evolution is much more than that. Either you don't know enough to understand what evolution is, or you don't  want to. Either way, I have explained it as best I can.

""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""''
     XD40;
         There are many here including myself, who shouild perhaps apologize for being so intellectually deprived. Naturally all of us who attended public school are well steeped in the evolutionist's cause, but how many have given anywhere near as much time to the counterpoint, which is Intelligent design ?  When a student already has had 12 years of one-dimensional propaganda shoveled into their heads, they are highly unlikely to even entertain the thought of any other view. 
    At least my grandaughter's Christian school is enlightened enough to present BOTH theories.
   Unbeknownst to many is the fact that there is a sizeable body of scientists who disagree with the prevailing attitudes.  Until recently they have perhaps been swimming against the popular current, but perhaps the tide is changing.  It seems that after a couple centuries of Darwinian propaganda without the expected "proof", the high tide of "evolution", may be slipping into an ebb. 
      Here are a group of eminent scientists who refuse to simply "swim with the popular school of fish"..
    http://www.icr.org/articles/type/9/
     
    Even the much used (and abused) monkey-to-man chart we all saw in grade school is and should be, taken into question.  There are  simply too many holes in that supposition.  There are not nearly enough bridging evidences to honestly create that picture.  It is just a great deal of speculation and acceptance of "what ifs" that went into that picture.
   A discussion of that along with other constructs, is discussed by more scientists here;
         http://www.wasdarwinright.com/earlyman.htm
 
   For further reading on the subject, I will recommend the following website, from where I pulled the questions at the lead of this thread.   http://www.conservapedia.com/Question_evolution!_campaign
 
    I do appreciate the tenor of Conservapedia's campaign.  Instead of claiming that those of the Darwinist faith are stupid, Neanderthals or grossly uninformed, they simply suggest.."question evolution"..
 
   BTW:  CONSERVAPEDIA is an excellent source of information on current events..no liberal drivel..

I didn't mean to come off as a know it all. Understanding evolution is extremely complex. You can't explain quantum physics without going into some heavy stuff. The same holds true for evolution.

[ironglow]

Ask Him yourself and then you can tell us what he said.

Thanks, excellent suggestion resulting in an excellent conversation!
Basically God said it's evolution and that the Bible was never meant to be a science book.

""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""'''
   Crusty;
     Scripturally speaking, you don't have much 'wiggle room'..  Read the very first verse in the Bible; that's (Genesis 1:1)
    "  IN THE BEGINNING GOD CREATED THE HEAVEN AND THE EARTH"
 
      Fact is the book of Genesis goes on to say He created everything else also.  So you disagree with God; just own up to it...don't try to twist scriptures.  Reminds one of Cinderella's ugly sisters who tried so hard to make the slipper fit their  big, ugly feet.     

[SHOOTALL]

When things get sticky evolution supporters say its to complex to understand. Christians have always known that and had faith . 

[ironglow]

Some of you are stuck in the old- how does a monkey turn into a man- way of thinking. As I said earlier , evolution is much more than that. Either you don't know enough to understand what evolution is, or you don't  want to. Either way, I have explained it as best I can.

""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""''
     XD40;
         There are many here including myself, who shouild perhaps apologize for being so intellectually deprived. Naturally all of us who attended public school are well steeped in the evolutionist's cause, but how many have given anywhere near as much time to the counterpoint, which is Intelligent design ?  When a student already has had 12 years of one-dimensional propaganda shoveled into their heads, they are highly unlikely to even entertain the thought of any other view. 
    At least my grandaughter's Christian school is enlightened enough to present BOTH theories.
   Unbeknownst to many is the fact that there is a sizeable body of scientists who disagree with the prevailing attitudes.  Until recently they have perhaps been swimming against the popular current, but perhaps the tide is changing.  It seems that after a couple centuries of Darwinian propaganda without the expected "proof", the high tide of "evolution", may be slipping into an ebb. 
      Here are a group of eminent scientists who refuse to simply "swim with the popular school of fish"..
    http://www.icr.org/articles/type/9/
     
    Even the much used (and abused) monkey-to-man chart we all saw in grade school is and should be, taken into question.  There are  simply too many holes in that supposition.  There are not nearly enough bridging evidences to honestly create that picture.  It is just a great deal of speculation and acceptance of "what ifs" that went into that picture.
   A discussion of that along with other constructs, is discussed by more scientists here;
         http://www.wasdarwinright.com/earlyman.htm
 
   For further reading on the subject, I will recommend the following website, from where I pulled the questions at the lead of this thread.   http://www.conservapedia.com/Question_evolution!_campaign
 
    I do appreciate the tenor of Conservapedia's campaign.  Instead of claiming that those of the Darwinist faith are stupid, Neanderthals or grossly uninformed, they simply suggest.."question evolution"..
 
   BTW:  CONSERVAPEDIA is an excellent source of information on current events..no liberal drivel..

I didn't mean to come off as a know it all. Understanding evolution is extremely complex. You can't explain quantum physics without going into some heavy stuff. The same holds true for evolution.

""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
  XD40;
  Did you even take a look at the references I linked you to above ?  I do hope you are open enough to check out other views!
    There, you will find a group of scientists who are very familiar with quantum physics and still disagree with the Darwinist faith.
   Try them, you may just find them interesting..

[BUGEYE]

IG, I read them all and unlike XDs treatise, they made complete sense.  evolutionists are like liberal politicians that think that us unwashed masses are too ignorant to understand their point of view.

[blind ear]

"and they ran around the tree until they turned to butter"

[BBF]

I think modern man got seeded or at least genetically monkeyed with. ,I'm sticking to that.

[XD40SC]

"and they ran around the tree until they turned to butter"

"and they ran around the tree until they turned to butter"

Yep- they completely missed the point I was trying to make. I give up especially when it turns to name calling.

[BBF]

....................................
 

.........................
............................... when it turns to name calling.

SOP here !

[XD40SC]

IG, I read them all and unlike XDs treatise, they made complete sense.  evolutionists are like liberal politicians that think that us unwashed masses are too ignorant to understand their point of view.

you forgot socalism, communists and the mention of Hitler. LOL

[BUGEYE]

"and they ran around the tree until they turned to butter"

"and they ran around the tree until they turned to butter"

Yep- they completely missed the point I was trying to make. I give up especially when it turns to name calling.

you made the statement that you had PROVED it.  sometimes baggage comes with a blanket statement like that.  I've been called simple-minded by athiests for believing in God.