Author Topic: Randy? - Powder Comparison  (Read 1281 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline sabotloader

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 783
Randy? - Powder Comparison
« on: January 10, 2004, 05:30:03 AM »
Randy, or anyone, I posed these questions on the CVA board but have not gotten any answers yet.

Question(s) what is the difference in:
1)volume of BP to 3 - 50 grain pellets of Pryrodex?
2) volume of BP to 3 - 50 grain pellets of T7
3) What is the average pressures created by
     (a)150 grains of BP
     (b) 3-50 grain Pyrodex Pellets
     (c) 3-50 grain T7 pellets?

Here is another concept from a poster what is your evaluation?

The manual for my MagBolt 150/26 is the same as the one online referenced above. As you read through it, there are several places that say to call or email if you have any questions.
I took advantage of that option in regards to Triple 7 powder and this is the response I got.

The max load with loose Pyrodex is 100 gr.
The max load with Pyrodex pellets is 150 gr.
The max load with loose Triple 7 is 120 gr.
The 120 gr Triple 7 load is equal to 150 gr Pyrodex pellet load.

This is not an exact quote but summarizes what was in the email.
Keep shooting muzzleloaders - they are a blast....

Offline Wolfhound

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 418
Randy? - Powder Comparison
« Reply #1 on: January 10, 2004, 05:50:12 AM »
Quote
The max load with loose Triple 7 is 120 gr.

That's odd. They say that the max loose powder load is 100 gr (BP, Pyro, 777).

I don't know the answers to your question but I wouldn't shoot more than 100 gr of pellets or powder in your rifle though.

Offline sabotloader

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 783
Randy? - Powder Comparison
« Reply #2 on: January 10, 2004, 06:08:22 AM »
That's the question that has been raised...  This e-mail was recieved from CVA to a poster who asked the direct question.

Wakeman sort of woke everybody up to the presseure stamp on the new CVA's and since then all kinds of questions have risen.  In my case I don't shoot pellets anyway, but I am shooting 100 grains of loose T7, pushing a 300 grain bullet in a new CVA Ultra Mag, and Staghorn.  I have no concern about the 100 in my Remington or Austin & Halleck inlines.

Another poster, indicated that 3-50 grain T7 pellets was equal to an average of 127.5 grains of loose T7.  Anyway I am hoping to get some comparisons...
Keep shooting muzzleloaders - they are a blast....

Offline Triple Se7en

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 161
Randy? - Powder Comparison
« Reply #3 on: January 10, 2004, 07:44:18 AM »
"Another poster, indicated that 3-50 grain T7 pellets was equal to an average of 127.5 grains of loose T7. Anyway I am hoping to get some comparisons"
===============================================

That poster was yours truly! That equality average I gave you at CVA.com was for "volume comparison".... not barrel pressure.
............. Keep Your Powder Dry ...................

Offline sabotloader

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 783
Randy? - Powder Comparison
« Reply #4 on: January 10, 2004, 07:52:45 AM »
Triple Se7en, if I misquoated - I am sorry - I do agree that is how I read  your comparison.  I would still like to to know the the average - most likely pressure questions - if there is an answer.  I am also aware that they can be universal because of the variances.
Keep shooting muzzleloaders - they are a blast....

Offline RandyWakeman

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1246
    • RandyWakeman
Re: Randy? - Powder Comparison
« Reply #5 on: January 10, 2004, 08:33:37 AM »
Quote from: sabotloader
Randy, or anyone, I posed these questions on the CVA board but have not gotten any answers yet.

Question(s) what is the difference in:
1)volume of BP to 3 - 50 grain pellets of Pryrodex?
2) volume of BP to 3 - 50 grain pellets of T7
3) What is the average pressures created by
     (a)150 grains of BP
     (b) 3-50 grain Pyrodex Pellets
     (c) 3-50 grain T7 pellets?

Here is another concept from a poster what is your evaluation?

The manual for my MagBolt 150/26 is the same as the one online referenced above. As you read through it, there are several places that say to call or email if you have any questions.
I took advantage of that option in regards to Triple 7 powder and this is the response I got.

The max load with loose Pyrodex is 100 gr.
The max load with Pyrodex pellets is 150 gr.
The max load with loose Triple 7 is 120 gr.
The 120 gr Triple 7 load is equal to 150 gr Pyrodex pellet load.

This is not an exact quote but summarizes what was in the email.



The "by volume" comparison really isn't possible, as they aren't easily measured that way-- it is an "equivalent," and you take Hodgdon's word on that. The equivalent isn't strictly possible, as velocity (and pressure) varies by brand of powder and type. FFFg tends to burn faster than FFg, and can develop higher pressures than FFg. "Swiss" brand blackpowder is known to be far hotter than Goex.

Judging a maximum load only by the amount of the powder charge is without any merit. It is that type of stupidity that I can't understand, coming from a manufacturer. It should fairly obvious that pressures jump all over the place, based on projectile type and weight. Even the brand or type of sabot can change the pressure quite a bit.

A few measured pressures from Lyman (p. 171-172), .50 cal. 22" in. test barrel with a 240 grain Hornady sabot:

100 gr. Goex FFG = 13,500 PSI, 100 gr. Elephant FFFg = 17,400 PSI, 100 gr., Pyrodex Select = 23,400 PSI, 100 gr. Pyrodex pellets = 20,200 PSI. That's all "100 grains" or two pellets, same saboted bullet, yet the difference can be huge-- and the extra nearly 10,000 PSI for the Pyrodex Select vs. Goex-- is roughly the entire pressure CVA barrels are proofed at.

Jump to a 400 grain Knight sabot, you'll see published pressures at 27,600 PSI for 100 gr. Pyrodex RS, and a whopping 33,500 PSI for 120 grains of Pyrodex Select.

Common sense should tell us that Pyrodex pellets and loose powder are not REALLY equivalents. If they were, then there would be no such thing as "150 grains pellets OR 100 grains loose powder maximum load."

It would all be just be 150 grains max. load, period. Or not.

No competent reloader would ever suggest that you exceed or break the powder manufacturer's recommendations. Yet, Hodgdon powder has 100 grains maximum for Triple 7 powder or T 7 pellets on every jar of powder or box of pellets sold. If any gun manufacturer tells you to ignore Hodgdon's warnings-- shouldn't they be well-prepared with data to prove to their customers WHY doing so is not imbecility of the highest order?

Offline sabotloader

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 783
Randy? - Powder Comparison
« Reply #6 on: January 10, 2004, 09:32:42 AM »
Thank you Randy, I was a little surprised to hear from on Saturday, but I am glad you were monitoring.

Your numbers do give me information, I wish I had all the equipment to do my own measurements, but....

The CVA barrel proof marking contiues to be a mystery, but I guess they have to live with that if it ever comes back to haunt them.  I am Ok with my CVA Firebolt - shooting 100gr. T7 with a 300 grain XTP/Nosler PP and I don't know why I would ever use 150 of anything.  The main reason for getting the CVA was for the 26 inch barrel - otherwise my 24" Remington serves the purpose, and to make the matter worse I just ordered a new A&H inline.
Keep shooting muzzleloaders - they are a blast....

Offline RandyWakeman

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1246
    • RandyWakeman
Randy? - Powder Comparison
« Reply #7 on: January 10, 2004, 10:16:48 AM »
Quote from: sabotloader
and to make the matter worse I just ordered a new A&H inline.


I don't think that will make things worse for you-- the A & H's shoot amazingly well, and are just better guns by a better company, with better testing, better triggers, and better service . . . if the three Austin & Hallecks I've tested are any indication.

Offline sabotloader

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 783
Randy? - Powder Comparison
« Reply #8 on: January 10, 2004, 10:55:03 AM »
No, I ment to make matters worse at home,  With 3 inlines and 3 sidelocks the addition of another inline - somebody in the house is starting to get irratated - I swear to her each are kinda like her household tools - they each do a different job.  That's really not holding much water.

I think I will be really happy with the A&H, I have read a couple of your assements and watched the video + others, so I did some research b4 ordering. I really do like how it shoulders - it feels a whole lot like my pre-64 Model 70 Winchester.

In Idaho we can not use 209's during muzzle loading season, we can though during the regular season.  I kind of made the switch this season, I think back to all the elk I have shot with high powered rifles and I can count on one hand the number that might have been out of range of a ML.  We are committed to using a ML for the entire big season next year + the muzzle loading season - then a sidelock during traditional season if I can find a season I can get to.
Keep shooting muzzleloaders - they are a blast....

Offline RandyWakeman

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1246
    • RandyWakeman
Randy? - Powder Comparison
« Reply #9 on: January 10, 2004, 11:05:46 AM »
Quote from: sabotloader
In Idaho we can not use 209's during muzzle loading season, we can though during the regular season.  


I'll confess to not understanding why the states with the lowest population densities, the lowest number of animals taken (see Michigan stats) think that 209 primers are worth busting a hunter for-- when there is nothing a musket cap won't light off.