Author Topic: Recoil: Contender vs XP100/Other Action Behind Grip  (Read 356 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Charlie-SA

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 63
Recoil: Contender vs XP100/Other Action Behind Grip
« on: February 28, 2012, 08:45:41 AM »
Seems I've seen comments on this subject but don't remember where.  Is there a noticible difference in the felt recoil between the Contender and pistols where the action is generally behind the grip?  Speaking of when the same load is used.  Question is just out of curiosity.

Offline Ladobe

  • Trade Count: (91)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3193
Re: Recoil: Contender vs XP100/Other Action Behind Grip
« Reply #1 on: February 28, 2012, 09:16:38 AM »
Can only answer from experience.   Since recoil never bothered me with any of the handguns I owned, not even the meanest, baddest handcannons, I may not have the opinion of others though.   But by design and weight, the bolt pistols are more pleasant to shoot in the heavier recoilers from my experience.   All of my XP-100's, Wichita's and a Weatherby bolter were mid grip though.   The only rear grip bolters I remember having off hand was a custom Sako in 6TCU, and Anschultz Exemplars in rimfire/Hornet making all of those very tame.   I prefer mid grip in a bolt handgun, so never even considered a XP-100R, or any others that have come down the road like it.   Would expect a mid grip to be more forgiving than a rear grip though FWIW.
Evolution at work. Over two million years ago the genus Homo had small cranial capacity and thick skin to protect them from their environment. One species has evolved into obese cranial fatheads with thin skin in comparison that whines about anything and everything as their shield against their environment. Meus